Skip to main content
🇩🇪GDPR-compliant
Find the right

Mockito Experts

to build reliable Java tests, matched in minutes from over 15,000 CVs with the power of AI

Hire experts who design maintainable unit tests, isolate Java dependencies with Mockito, and integrate test doubles into Spring Boot and Maven or Gradle projects. FRATCH matches you quickly with precise, vetted and available freelancers.

Meet FRATCH Experts who have recently used Mockito

Verified expert

Ali A.

View profile

Enterprise Software Architect | Payments, Cloud & AI Platforms

Frankfurt
Ali A.

Last position:

Founder & Architect at Independent AI R&D

  • Fully on-premises LLM document-examination platform for a compliance-critical banking domain: agentic LangGraph pipeline with deterministic verification, every AI judgment structured and source-anchored; ~960 automated tests, zero data egress
  • GPU throughput engineering (quantized serving, speculative decoding, prefix caching): 9.5x extraction speed-up, 500+ multi-document case files per day on a single A100
  • AI-native EDI/EDIFACT integration platform (~116k LOC Java 25 / Spring Boot 4, 1,900+ tests): LLM-drafted partner mappings machine-verified before go-live (DFDL conformance, field-coverage checks, dry runs), ~99.5% byte match on real customer files — replacing weeks of manual mapping per partner
Verified expert

Fred H.

View profile

Senior Java Architect and Developer | Domain Architect (DDD, Knowledge Systems)

Munich
Fred H.

Last position:

Software Architect and Developer at Personal project

  • Recurring problem in my own AI-assisted projects: requirements analysis, use cases, and architecture decisions can be created quickly with AI support, but remain difficult to follow and scattered across Markdown files – knowledge is lost as soon as it is no longer in the context window. arknet turns requirements engineering and architecture knowledge into structured, verifiable data instead of plain text: requirements, use cases, and architecture decisions form a consistently linked knowledge graph, traceable from requirement to architecture decision – queryable by both people and AI agents. Technically based on RDF/OWL and a custom MCP server.

  • Result: Working MCP daemon, Docker image published automatically to GHCR, nine hexagonal modules, eleven ADRs (including an Open-Core licensing model). Requirements engineering and Ubiquitous Language hexagons are active. Public as a Community Edition under Apache-2.0 since 07/2026 (github.com/kogn-io/arknet), together with the Claude Code plugin and GHCR image; Open-Core model.

  • Label: Java, Maven, RDF, RDF4J, OWL, SPARQL, Model Context Protocol, Spring AI, Docker, GitHub, Git, Claude Code, Obsidian, DDD, Hexagonal Architecture, ArchUnit, JUnit, AssertJ, Interface Development, Software Architecture, Continuous Integration, Knowledge Management

Verified expert

Ramazan C.

View profile

Lead Software Engineer AI-Data Enthusiast

Mainz
Ramazan C.

Last position:

Fullstack-/DevOps Engineer at BKA (Federal Criminal Police Office)

Development and further development of an internal platform for managing and providing technical resources, virtual machines, and infrastructure services. The platform supports self-service processes and covers functions that are conceptually comparable to cloud management solutions like Azure or AWS.

  • Responsible involvement in the design, development, and implementation of new backend and frontend features
  • Hands-on development with Java, Spring Boot, Python, and Angular
  • Implementation of REST interfaces, business logic, validations, and integrations into existing system landscapes
  • Further development of modern web interfaces with Angular, including connection to backend services
  • Participation in architecture and design decisions within the team, especially with regard to scalability, maintainability, and clean interfaces
  • Containerization and deployment of applications with Docker, Kubernetes, and Helm
  • Support with CI/CD processes and deployment to Kubernetes-based environments
  • Work in the environment of vSphere, Broadcom, GitLab CI/CD, ArgoCD, Maven, npm, and NuGet
  • Close collaboration with developers, business teams, DevOps, and other technical stakeholders
  • Analysis of technical requirements, deriving suitable solutions, and independent implementation in an agile team
  • Use of GitHub Copilot to support code generation, refactoring, test case creation, and technical documentation

Methods/ tools/ technologies: Languages & frameworks: Java (21), Spring Boot (4.x), Python, Angular, Robot Framework, Kubernetes, Helm Persistence: PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Hibernate, Liquibase Architecture & communication: REST, gRPC, GraphQL, Apache Kafka, OpenAPI, Microservices, Event Driven, Domain Driven Design Cloud & infrastructure: Terraform, Docker, Rancher, Helm, Ansible Security: OAuth2, MS (Entra ID), web security, Keycloak (extensions for detailed group rights) DevOps: GitLab CI/CD, Ansible, Maven, Gradle, Grafana, Prometheus, Git, GitHub Copilot Testing & QM: JUnit, Robot Framework, automated component and integration tests, E2E tests with Playwright, Testcontainers, EasyMock Methodology & approach: Kanban, JIRA, Confluence, Clean Code

Verified expert

Marcus B.

View profile

Java Cloud Expert

Grünwald
Marcus B.

Last position:

Java and Quarkus Expert at Large German energy service provider

  • Modernization of a large-scale Java enterprise application*

The project is modernizing a complex enterprise application that has grown over many years. The existing Spring-based legacy system runs on Java 8, OSGi, and Eclipse RCP and is being gradually migrated to a modern, maintainable architecture with Java 25 and Quarkus.

Marcus works on analysis, architecture, refactoring, and implementation. One focus is on untangling historically grown structures and dependencies and on building a clean, sustainable Java and Quarkus technology stack.

Tools & technologies: Java 8, Java 25, Quarkus, Hibernate ORM with Panache, EclipseLink, OSGi, Eclipse RCP, Maven, JUnit, Mockito, REST, JSON, Git, Eclipse IDE, IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate, Jira, Confluence

Verified expert

Hooman B.

View profile

Fullstack Developer

Cologne
Hooman B.

Last position:

Fullstack Developer at Möbel Roller GmbH

  • Further development of the existing e-commerce platform based on SAP Commerce (Hybris) to meet the growing demands of digital commerce.
  • Ensuring the scalability and performance of the backend, so the platform remained stable and efficient even under heavy user load.
  • Development and integration of new OCC REST APIs and services for modular extensions and flexible adjustments, to implement new features quickly.
  • Optimization of data flows and interfaces, which significantly improved platform efficiency and system performance.
  • Ensuring a maintainable and scalable code base by using Clean Code principles, proven design patterns, and a future-proof architecture.
  • Reduction of errors through extensive testing with JUnit, Mockito, and load tests with Gatling, supported by the introduction of automated test processes.
  • Improved system performance through targeted refactoring measures and efficient database queries, especially to handle peak loads.
  • Use of modern cloud and monitoring tools such as Kubernetes, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Grafana to ensure a stable and monitored infrastructure.
  • Clear improvement in efficiency, scalability, and reliability of the platform, which now meets the demands of a dynamic and growing e-commerce market.
Verified expert

Marijn S.

View profile

Cloud Solutions Architect or Senior Software Engineer

Düsseldorf
Marijn S.

Last position:

Senior Software Engineer at Puls Security GmbH

  • Optimizing and accelera­tion of our Gitlab CI pipeline

  • Conceptual work for the PoC of the Zero Trust system

  • Extension of the policy-engine backend in Go

  • Extension of the policy-testing mechanism in Python

  • Architectural design of the PEP component of Zero Trust

  • Documentation of the product

  • Technologies: Zero Trust, Go, Python, Gitlab CI, Docker, JWT, Domain-Driven Design

Verified expert

Niko S.

View profile

Developing Architect / Solution Architect

Hamburg
Niko S.

Last position:

Developing Architect, Technical Lead "gridlytics" at HH Energienetze

  • Building a data integration platform for high, medium, and low voltage assets for contextual analysis of time series with master data from the SCADA control system (IEC 60870 104), INIS, and SAP.
  • Responsibility for the architecture and implementation of the solution, as well as sparring partner for the Product Owner.
  • Use of Kotlin, Spring Boot, Maven, TimescaleDB, PostgreSQL, liquibase, Elements IoT, Docker, Kubernetes, Grafana, Python, jupyter, and various API gateways.
Verified expert

Sabahattin K.

View profile

Senior Java Developer | Lead Developer | Architect | Team Lead

Diedorf
Sabahattin K.

Last position:

Sole responsibility (design, development, infrastructure, operations) at Own project busik.ch

  • Ride-sharing and bus platform, live and fully functional. Backend with Spring Boot 4.1 on Java 21, PostgreSQL with Flyway, and Testcontainers integration tests. Hosted in my own AWS account (ECS Fargate, ALB, ECR, IAM Least-Privilege) with CI/CD via GitHub Actions and OIDC federation without static credentials. Development fully AI-supported with Claude Code, including custom skills and project-specific memory. Spring Boot · Java 21 · PostgreSQL · Flyway · Docker · AWS ECS/ALB/ECR · CI/CD · GitHub Actions · Claude Code
Verified expert

Christoph T.

View profile

Architect, Business Analyst, Developer

Magdeburg
Christoph T.

Last position:

Backend Software Developer (Java) at German Football Association (DFB) e. V.

  • Client: Prime Force Group GmbH

Technologies used: Java 25, Spring Boot 4, MapStruct, JSpecify, PostgreSQL, Redis, Liquibase, REST/OpenAPI, Apache Kafka, Apache Solr, OpenID Connect via IronGate/Keycloak, SAP Customer Data Cloud, JUnit, Testcontainers, Karate, Playwright, GitLab monorepo with CI/CD, Jenkins, JFrog Artifactory, FluxCD, Docker, Kubernetes on Azure, OpenTelemetry, arc42, Jira, Confluence

The Team Management Center is the new central platform of the DFB for planning, managing, and carrying out team activities for the national teams - from squad selection and training camps to communication with players, clubs, and legal guardians. The platform is designed for multi-tenancy for the DFB and regional associations; player, club, and master data are intentionally not copied, but connected at runtime via the DFBnet APIs.

I have been involved in the project continuously since the architecture and concept phase (Sprint 0) and work in a distributed Scrum team in two-week sprints. In addition to implementation, my focus is on architecture alignment, connecting the DFBnet interfaces, as well as code reviews and test automation as quality assurance in the team.

Focus areas:

  • Development and implementation of the multi-tenancy concept (tenant model for the DFB and regional associations), including data model, access layer, and Liquibase migrations.
  • Design of the person service and the search concept based on Apache Solr.
  • Integration of the DFBnet APIs (player, person, and club search, club data), including authentication and synchronous master data synchronization.
  • Hardening the integration through resilience patterns: separate read timeouts for each search path, correction of circuit breaker counting, limiting parallel requests, and a club cache to reduce load on the external system.
  • Development of self-service endpoints for players (own activities, activity details, games), including an access concept for participants, as well as person documents and file uploads.
  • Standardization of API design: OpenAPI annotations, nullability model via a custom ModelConverter, JSpecify migration of the DTOs, and documented API guidelines.
  • Build and maintenance of Karate-based API and integration tests, integration tests with Testcontainers, test guidelines, and bug triage from the integration and reference environments.
  • Code reviews via merge requests, architecture documentation according to arc42, and architecture decisions (ADRs) in Confluence.
  • Automated deployment to the integration and reference environments, analysis of login and OIDC issues in combination with IronGate.

Status: ongoing - as of 08/2026 in Sprint 17, around 940 person hours worked; testable delivery to the integration environment every two weeks.

Verified expert

Boris S.

View profile

Senior Software Developer

Ratingen
Boris S.

Last position:

Generalist expert for software development at Mercor

  • Training AI models, evaluating images and text UI/UX, turning the provided data into insights through OpenAI Feather as part of the machine learning workflow

Technologies: OpenAI Feather

Verified expert

Osman T.

View profile

Senior Developer and Consultant

Aschaffenburg
Osman T.

Last position:

Senior Architect, DevOps Engineer at genPsoft GmbH

IT consulting, analysis, architecture design, new and further development, code review, test automation, continuous integration, continuous delivery in backend and frontend areas for Automotive Project Instavalo.

Frontend:

  • Implementation of UI components according to specifications, especially style guides and responsive design eith React and Typescript
  • Component testing
  • Code documentation
  • CI/CD with Gitlab Pipeline

Backend / IoT:

  • Analysis and architectural design with AWS Greengrass IoT on Edge Devices
  • Setting up Microservices containers with Docker Compose on Edge device with AWS Greengrass and AWS IoT IAM, Token Exchange Service, Ansible
  • CI/CD with Gitlab Pipeline, Terraform, AWS ECR
  • Logging with Fluentbit Lua Language for AWS Cloudwatch
  • Python Lambda for AWS Greengrass Recipe deployment on Edge Devices
  • Implementation of test-driven development with JUnit, Mockito, and code Coverage
  • Jacoco
  • Definition of REST interfaces with OpenAPI / Swagger
  • Development and enhancement of software based on Java Quarkus, Typescript NestJs NodeJs and Python
  • Authentication and authorization in Aws IAM
  • Development of REST and gRPC interfaces for the frontend and backend
  • Implementation of Maven dependencies with DevSecOps OWASP
  • Spring AI, Jetbrains AI Assistant, Junie, Github Copilot, Claude Code, Agents, Skills, Command, Hooks, Subagents
Verified expert

Stefan A.

View profile

Senior Backend Architect — Regulated Java & Go Systems

Forstern
Stefan A.

Last position:

Sole Architect and Developer at Bauernhof-Eis Stangl GbR

Design and implementation of a compact ERP, CRM, accounting, and production-planning platform for a German food manufacturer. The system replaces Rechnung11, self-built Excel sheets, and manual processes for fewer than 10 internal users.

  • Designed and implemented the full platform architecture as sole architect and developer.
  • Built modules for customer management, B2B order handling, invoicing, production planning, and accounting support.
  • Implemented DATEV export, ZUGFeRD/XRechnung e-invoicing, FinTS bank statement synchronization, and GoBD audit trail concepts.
  • Used AI-supported workflows for prototyping, test support, and implementation acceleration while retaining full architecture, review, testing strategy, and technical ownership.

Technology: Java 23, Spring Boot 3, Spring Data JPA, Spring Security, Vue 3, TypeScript, PostgreSQL, Flyway, REST, OpenAPI, JWT, TOTP, RBAC, DATEV, FinTS, ZUGFeRD, XRechnung, GoBD, JUnit, Mockito, Testcontainers, Playwright, Docker, GitLab CI/CD

Verified expert

Arkadius S.

View profile

Senior Java Backend Developer | API & Integration Development | Cloud-Native Microservices | Regulated & KRITIS-Related

Dortmund
Arkadius S.

Last position:

AWS Pricing Platform / API & Integration Architecture at Porsche Digital

Development and evolutionary further development of a highly available, cloud-native microservice and integration architecture for dealer and retail processes in the Porsche Car Configurator.

Responsibilities

  • Development of Java-/Kotlin-based backend, API, and integration components (Spring Boot)
  • Integration of internal and external systems via REST/OpenAPI, GraphQL, Apache Kafka, and AWS SQS (synchronous and asynchronous)
  • Implementation of stable, high-performance communication and data flows in a cloud-native platform architecture
  • Processing of structured data formats (JSON, Protobuf, GraphQL schemas) based on existing API patterns
  • Performance optimization of distributed microservices with reduced response times and higher operational stability
  • Technical tests (unit, integration, and API tests) as well as error analysis in production-like environments
  • AWS Infrastructure as Code with Terraform and AWS CDK
  • CI/CD automation (build, test, and deployment pipelines) with GitHub Actions
  • AI-supported feature implementation (GitHub Copilot Agent)

Label: Kotlin, Java 25, Spring Boot 4, Protobuf, TypeScript, AWS, Terraform, CDK, Apache Kafka, AWS SQS, REST/OpenAPI, GraphQL, JSON, PostgreSQL, Docker, GitHub Actions, Maven, Gradle, JUnit, Mockito, Testcontainers

Verified expert

Rüdiger S.

View profile

Full-Stack Software Engineer / Consultant for Digitalization

Berlin
Rüdiger S.

Last position:

Full-Stack Software Engineer / Consultant for Digitalization at ARTEVENT

  • Designed, built, and launched an internal event planning web application used by over 100 department leads for a large event, despite having no dedicated testing phase.

  • Ensured smooth, failure-free operation during first production use, leading to the tool being adopted for future events.

  • Automated catering calculations and related workflows, significantly reducing email communication and manual computation effort for meal planning.

  • Managed deployment and hosting on a Linux server using Coolify, including application setup and runtime operations.

  • Hired and guided a communication designer on UX while independently owning all technical decisions and implementation.

Discover over 15,000 top freelancers

Statistics of experts using Mockito

Aggregated from the professional profiles of matched freelancers.

Experience

19 years

Mockito experts have 19 years of professional experience on average.

Position duration

1.8 years

Mockito experts stay in a single position for 1.8 years on average.

Positions per freelancer

13

Mockito experts have completed 13 positions on average over the course of their careers.

Top business areas

Information Technology, Product Development, Quality Assurance

Mockito experts have gathered most of their hands-on project experience in Information Technology, Product Development, and Quality Assurance.

Top industries

Information Technology, Banking and Finance, Automotive

Mockito experts are most in demand in Information Technology, Banking and Finance, and Automotive.

Certification focus areas

Information Technology, Product Development, Project Management

Mockito experts earn their certifications most often in Information Technology, Product Development, and Project Management.

Bachelor's degree or higher

96%

96% of Mockito experts hold at least a Bachelor's degree.

Master's degree or higher

59%

59% of Mockito experts hold at least a Master's degree.

Doctorate

10%

10% of Mockito experts have a doctorate (PhD).

Certifications per freelancer

3

Mockito experts hold 3 professional certifications on average.

Most common languages

German, English, French

Mockito experts most often speak German, English, and French.

Speak two or more languages

96%

96% of Mockito experts speak two or more languages.

Based on our profile pool as of 26 Sep 2026.

Daily rate distribution

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
5% of Mockito experts charge less than €400 per day.
56% of Mockito experts charge between €400 and €800 per day.
37% of Mockito experts charge between €800 and €1200 per day.
1% of Mockito experts charge between €1200 and €1600 per day.
1% of Mockito experts charge €1600 or more per day.
<€400 €400-​800 €800-​1200 €1200-​1600 €1600+

The chart shows how the daily rates of experts in this technology are distributed, based on recent contracts on our platform. Each bar covers a rate range — its height shows the share of experts charging within that range.

Average rates of experts using Mockito

Rates are based on recent contracts and do not include FRATCH margin.

800
600
400
200
Rate comparison chart
Daily rate avg. 731 €

The average daily rate is the mean of all daily rates from recent contracts of comparable freelancers on our platform.

800
600
400
200
Rate comparison chart
Median rate 720 €

The median daily rate is the middle value of all daily rates — half of comparable freelancers charge less, half charge more. Unlike the average, it is barely affected by outliers.

Calculated based on our freelancers’ daily rates as of 26 Sep 2026. Actual rates may vary depending on seniority level, experience, skill specialization, project complexity, and engagement length.

Mockito experts industry focus

See which industries our matched freelancers work in most often — every figure is calculated live from the freelancers on FRATCH.

  • Information Technology (97%)
  • Banking and Finance (63%)
  • Automotive (42%)
  • Retail (41%)
  • Insurance (39%)
  • Transportation (38%)
  • Government and Administration (36%)
  • Healthcare (31%)

Please note that freelancers can work across multiple industries, so percentages overlap.

About the technology

What Mockito does

Mockito is an open-source mocking framework for Java. It lets teams replace real dependencies with controlled test doubles, verify interactions, and isolate the unit under test. This makes focused unit tests practical for services that call repositories, APIs, message clients, or other components.

Where it fits

Mockito is common in Java and Spring applications tested with JUnit. It works with Maven and Gradle builds, integrates with Spring Boot test setups, and supports annotations, argument matchers, stubbing, verification, and strictness controls. Kotlin teams may also use it alongside Kotlin-aware testing tools.

Typical deliverables

  • Unit test suites for service and domain logic
  • Mocks for repositories, gateways, clients, and event publishers
  • Interaction verification for important collaboration paths
  • Refactoring of brittle or over-specified tests
  • Test configuration for Maven, Gradle, JUnit, and Spring Boot

Strong test design keeps mocks focused on meaningful boundaries rather than reproducing implementation details.

When companies need specialists

Companies often bring in Mockito expertise when coverage is weak, tests are slow, or a Java codebase is difficult to change safely. A specialist can establish a testing approach during a new service build, modernize legacy tests, or help a team separate unit, integration, and contract testing. This is useful in finance, commerce, logistics, healthcare, and other systems with complex business rules.

Skills around Mockito

Effective work with Mockito depends on more than writing stubs. Professionals should understand Java interfaces, dependency injection, object design, JUnit lifecycle and assertions, and the difference between mocks, spies, fakes, and real collaborators. Experience with Spring test slices, asynchronous code, databases, REST clients, and continuous integration helps keep the test suite trustworthy.

How quality is judged

Good Mockito tests explain expected behavior and fail for the right reason. They avoid excessive verification, unnecessary mocking of value objects, and tests that pass only because the implementation is copied into the setup. Look for professionals who can diagnose flaky tests, choose integration tests when mocks would hide defects, and leave readable suites that support future refactoring.

Published on:
FRATCH GPT

FRATCH GPT delivers freelancer proposals with clear reasoning and transparent pricing in minutes, helping your hiring department quickly and compliantly find the best talent.

Give it a try:

Try FRATCH GPT

Frequently asked questions

Everything clients usually want to know about Mockito, in one place.

Mockito is used to create mock objects that stand in for real collaborators during unit tests. Teams can define return values, simulate failures, and verify important interactions without calling databases, external services, or message systems.

Mockito generally uses a readable, behavior-focused API and fits naturally with JUnit and Spring-based Java projects. EasyMock and JMockit take different approaches to recording expectations or instrumenting code, so the right choice depends on test style, legacy constraints, and the boundaries in the application.

A strong Mockito specialist should also understand Java, JUnit, dependency injection, Maven or Gradle, and continuous integration. Spring Boot testing, REST clients, persistence, asynchronous workflows, and contract testing are valuable when mocks are part of a broader test strategy.

A small test change may only require familiarity with Mockito and the surrounding Java code. Larger refactoring or test architecture work calls for a professional who can assess existing coverage, reduce brittle interaction tests, and decide where integration tests are more appropriate.

Mockito work is usually well suited to remote collaboration because tests, build files, and failures can be reviewed in a shared repository. Clear requirements, reproducible builds, and access to CI logs matter more than physical presence, while on-site work may help when testing is closely tied to local systems or regulated environments.

High-quality Mockito tests are readable, focused, and stable under refactoring. Check whether they verify business behavior rather than private implementation details, use realistic failure cases, avoid unnecessary stubbing, and complement mocks with suitable integration or contract tests.

Mockito works well with Spring Boot when teams need to isolate a service or replace selected collaborators in a test context. Professionals should know when to use plain unit tests, Spring test slices, or a full application context so the suite remains fast without losing meaningful coverage.

A frequent Mockito mistake is mocking every dependency and verifying every call, which can make tests mirror implementation details. Other problems include broad argument matchers, unfinished stubbing, partial mocks used without a clear reason, and relying on mocks where a real in-memory component would reveal more.

The average hourly rate of freelancers who have used Mockito in their recent projects is 91 €, which corresponds to a daily rate of about 731 € based on an 8-hour working day.

Of the freelancers who have used Mockito in their recent projects, 96% hold at least a Bachelor's degree, 59% hold at least a Master's degree, and 10% hold a doctorate.

On average, freelancers who have used Mockito in their recent projects have 19 years of professional experience, with a single engagement typically lasting around 1.8 years.

The most common languages among freelancers who have used Mockito in their recent projects are German (98%), English (96%), and French (13%).

The most common industries among freelancers who have used Mockito in their recent projects are Information Technology (97%), Banking and Finance (63%), and Automotive (42%).

The most common business areas among freelancers who have used Mockito in their recent projects are Information Technology (100%), Product Development (98%), and Quality Assurance (64%).

Main locations of FRATCH Experts, who have recently used Mockito

Our freelancers and interim experts are at home all over Germany — available on-site in Berlin, Hamburg, Munich and every major business hub, or fully remote. Choose a city to discover matched specialists, local market insights and up-to-date availability.

Berlin Hamburg Munich Cologne Frankfurt Stuttgart Dusseldorf Leipzig Dortmund Essen Bremen Dresden Hanover Nuremberg

In Austria our freelancers and interim experts support companies from Vienna to Graz — on-site where your project needs them, or fully remote. Choose a city to discover matched specialists, local market insights and up-to-date availability.

Vienna Graz

Across Switzerland our specialists are active in Zurich, Geneva, Basel and Bern — working on-site or fully remote. Choose a city to discover matched specialists, local market insights and up-to-date availability.

Zurich Geneva Basel Bern

Countries:

Request a free demo

Get in touch with the FRATCH team and we will get back to you within 4 hours.

Contact form

Would you rather directly get in touch?
We always have the time for a call or email!

FRATCH CEO avatar

Philipp Thomaschewski

FRATCH CEO

LinkedInFRATCH