Skip to main content
🇩🇪GDPR-compliant
Build connected AI workflows with

Model Context Protocol Experts in Germany

, matched with vetted specialists in minutes

Hire experts who connect AI applications to business data and tools, design secure MCP servers, and integrate assistants with enterprise systems. Get fast, precise matching with vetted, available freelancers for your Model Context Protocol project.

Meet FRATCH Experts in Germany, who have recently used Model Context Protocol

Verified expert

Patrick L.

View profile

Senior AI Software Engineer with 9 years of experience delivering practical AI products for enterprise and public sector

Frankfurt am Main
Patrick L.

Last position:

Senior GenAI Fullstack Developer at SBH (Schulbau Hamburg)

Remote freelance role focused on Agentic AI strategy, secure application patterns, and reusable agentic workflows for a government agency.

  • Development and implementation of an open-source Agentic AI strategy for a government agency, with a focus on GDPR, security, and self-hosted solutions
  • Development of reusable agentic workflows and business applications that enable non-technical employees to solve business problems independently
  • Implementation of nine business applications with Single Sign-On (SSO) and Azure PostgreSQL integration on Hetzner Linux servers

Techstack: Python, Streamlit, Anthropic SDK (Claude), Azure, Linux, PostgreSQL, MS SQL, Angular

Verified expert

Gabin Maxime N.

View profile

AI/ML Engineer · Agentic AI

Freising
Gabin Maxime N.

Last position:

Multi-Agent R&D Pipeline (3 Custom Agents) at Independent Project

  • Claude Code subagents, MCP, Pydantic V2, pytest, bandit

  • Designed and shipped 3 specialized agents that hand work down a line: a research agent writes a cited implementation spec, a coding agent builds the modular code and its tests, a review agent ranks findings by severity and applies the fixes. Each handoff is a structured document, so no stage depends on another agent's context window.

  • Connected the research agent to an academic-research MCP server (Semantic Scholar, ArXiv, Hugging Face Hub, citation snowballing) so every reference traces to a tool result rather than the model. Gated commits behind ruff, mypy, pytest and bandit, required human sign-off before installs and commits, and persisted session state on disk so long runs survive a context reset.

Verified expert

Onur K.

View profile

AI & Automation Consultant · Project Manager for AI Projects

Braunschweig
Onur K.

Last position:

Project Manager & Outsourcing Manager at SENEC GmbH (EnBW Group)

  • Built a scalable nearshore IT developer hub (Croatia, Czech Republic, Poland) as an independent company through a BOT model (Build – Operate – Transfer)
  • Identified, selected, and managed full-service agencies; introduced management and control mechanisms, including KPIs, SLAs, and regular service reviews
  • Prepared and reviewed data processing agreements and framework contracts in coordination with Legal & Compliance; integrated regulatory requirements (including KRITIS) into process design
  • Advised on cloud vs. on-premise strategies, data storage, and authorization concepts; supported Procurement with tendering and service provider evaluations
  • Managed change and process harmonization between internal teams and nearshore partners; reported to executive management, CFO, and CIO

Result: Scalable IT developer hub with an audit-ready governance model, reduced operating costs, and accelerated product development.

Verified expert

Jörg K.

View profile

Principal Agile Coach & Management Consultant

Potsdam
Jörg K.

Last position:

Exec. Coach / Consultant / Agilist at HASOMED GmbH

  • Repaired a broken “ScrumBan” process, then established a pure Kanban system; increased output in the Kanban flow by 22% within four weeks

  • Increased team autonomy and decision-making ability by implementing new decision strategies; resulting in up to 25% better outcomes

  • Redesigned retrospectives (including one-to-one coaching and workshops), which led to consistent implementation of the resulting action items

  • Intensive coaching of Product Owners (POs) to develop and support “Empowered Teams”, alongside leadership development to place agile frameworks and methods in a realistic context (“de-illusioning”)

  • Supported change management processes to promote an agile company culture among management and teams, improving internal communication to increase transparency and effectiveness in agile processes

Verified expert

Peter S.

View profile

Senior AI, Data & Computer Vision Expert

Mannheim
Peter S.

Last position:

Senior ML Engineer & AI Researcher at Anonymous Client

Project: Defect Generation on Test-Bench Images of Metal Surfaces Environment: Automated Visual Inspection (AVI), Metallurgy & Manufacturing

  • Objective & Implementation: Designed, architected, and trained Generative Adversarial Networks (Pix2PixHD / SPADE) for image-to-image transformation. Targeted generation of synthetic material defects (e.g., cracks, inclusions, scale) on rough metal surfaces under real test-bench lighting conditions for privacy-compliant and efficient dataset expansion (data augmentation).
  • Technical Design: Implemented robust Generative AI and computer vision pipelines in Python and PyTorch. Used semantic segmentation approaches for mask-controlled defect synthesis and subsequent evaluation with EfficientDet object detection models.
  • Business Impact: Massive dataset upscaling (10x) without time-consuming and costly physical test-bench runs, while significantly improving the detection performance of automated inspection systems.

Technologies & Skills Used: Python | PyTorch | SPADE | Pix2PixHD | EfficientDet | Machine Learning | Semantic Segmentation | Computer Vision

Verified expert

Jens H.

View profile

Interim CTO / CDO & Enterprise Architect | AI Compliance & EU AI Act, Azure AI Foundry | Lawyer & Computer Scientist

Wathlingen
Jens H.

Last position:

Interim CTO (occasional assignments) at Fujitsu / FSAS

Stabilization of an Azure/.NET landscape in live operation.

  • Architecture, DevOps, and operational readiness; technical decisions under time pressure
  • Azure DevOps, monitoring, ETL/ELT, cloud security, FinOps, and data-mesh-related topics

Technologies: Azure DevOps, .NET, CI/CD, monitoring, FinOps

Verified expert

Saqib J.

View profile

Senior Solution & Software Architect · Interim IT Lead · AI/Agentic AI, Cloud, .NET

Erlensee
Saqib J.

Last position:

AI Developer / AI Engineer (Lead) at KOM4TEC GmbH

  • Designed and implemented modular AI assistants for sales and business processes within the Microsoft ecosystem (Agentic AI, Copilot extensions)
  • Frontend architecture and development with React + TypeScript for embedded chat and assistant surfaces (streaming UI, Hooks, React Query, OpenAPI clients)
  • Enterprise-level agent development: reusable skill/agent library, MCP servers, review and compliance gates
  • LLM integration into the user experience: Anthropic (Claude), OpenAI, tool use, RAG pipelines, prompt engineering, guardrails
  • Architecture and code review consulting, and mentoring within the AI development team
  • Integration with Microsoft Graph, Power Platform, and Azure services
  • Technologies: React, TypeScript, Anthropic Claude, OpenAI, MCP, RAG, Microsoft Graph, Power Platform, Azure
Verified expert

Ali A.

View profile

Enterprise Software Architect | Payments, Cloud & AI Platforms

Frankfurt
Ali A.

Last position:

Founder & Architect at Independent AI R&D

  • Fully on-premises LLM document-examination platform for a compliance-critical banking domain: agentic LangGraph pipeline with deterministic verification, every AI judgment structured and source-anchored; ~960 automated tests, zero data egress
  • GPU throughput engineering (quantized serving, speculative decoding, prefix caching): 9.5x extraction speed-up, 500+ multi-document case files per day on a single A100
  • AI-native EDI/EDIFACT integration platform (~116k LOC Java 25 / Spring Boot 4, 1,900+ tests): LLM-drafted partner mappings machine-verified before go-live (DFDL conformance, field-coverage checks, dry runs), ~99.5% byte match on real customer files — replacing weeks of manual mapping per partner
Verified expert

Maximilian B.

View profile

Freelance AI Systems & Platform Architect

Burglengenfeld
Maximilian B.

Last position:

Co-developer at Nikan AI Solutions GmbH

Multi-Agent Document-Generation Platform

Problem:

Turn a single prompt into a well-researched, structured and cited document, while keeping the user in control: every stage can be reviewed, corrected or revisited before the system moves on.

Architecture:

A multi-agent system orchestrated by a central controller. More than 20 specialised pydantic-ai subagents (understanding, structuring, planning, research, writing, assembly, cross-reference check, glossary, citation, reference table and more) pass results forward through a shared plan persisted in Postgres (asyncpg); a runner layer dispatches each task by name to its agent, and mechanical steps such as formatting, table of contents and list of figures are deterministic code instead of LLM calls. Provider (Anthropic or OpenAI) is a configuration setting, and responses stream over Server-Sent Events.

Hosting & Infrastructure:

Stateless container run as a Scaleway Serverless Container on a private network with managed PostgreSQL, object storage for finished documents and assets, and centralized log shipping (Loki / Scaleway Cockpit), provisioned with OpenTofu modules and deployed through GitLab CI; usage is metered per API key.

My Contribution & Key Decisions:

  • Central decision controller: a satisfaction classifier turns the user's free-text feedback into a verdict (keep working, advance, cancel or revise an earlier task), and a middleware applies it to the plan. Plan progression supports jumping back to earlier tasks and re-running the stages after them.
  • Research and writing fan-out: planning produces a plan from which a research-design agent generates individual research tasks and a writing-design agent generates individual writing tasks, each linked to the research it needs. Every task runs in its own dedicated agent with its own conversation history.
  • Self-review and human-in-the-loop: after each step a critical-thinking agent reviews the output; the user can accept, refine, or ask questions about a critique before the plan advances.
  • MCP integrations: two remote MCP servers, web search and internal document search, connected through pydantic-ai with retries and long-running tool-call timeouts. Classifier agents decide per task whether web search is needed, and a small model condenses raw search results into structured findings before they reach the writing agents.

Usage Metering:

Clients authenticate with an API key validated against a key-management service; consumption is charged in credits calculated from token usage per model plus a markup, and exhausted quota is answered with HTTP 429.

Verified expert

Mirza K.

View profile

Agentic AI for a DeepResearch project

München
Mirza K.

Last position:

Agentic Automation and a RAG system

  • This project involved extraction of intelligence data to support report writing for a company that provides geopolitical, global, commercial intelligence. The data have been gathered from a number of resources (interview transcripts, online data, internal documents), and then a knowledge base has been build from it. This was the basis of a complex RAG system, that was evaluated against a golden dataset. Agents have been used to find out the contradicting intelligence, the statements supporting each other, and to store back the generated knowledge.

Used: Python, RAG, LangGraph, LangChain, deepeval, MCP

Verified expert

Anthony M.

View profile

CodeValdCortex - Enterprise Multi-Agent AI Orchestration Platform

Frankfurt
Anthony M.

Last position:

Research and Development, AI for Enterprise at Mwanachama

  • Built an MCP (Model Context Protocol) layer for Mwanachama's agency service, turning domain manager methods into callable AI-agent tools. This included a composite tool that builds a full organization design (org chart, goals, workflows, RACI matrix) from one specification.
  • Built the chat-driven agency builder (Wakala Studio and API), where an organization describes its structure in natural language and an AI agent uses those tools to construct and modify the live design.
  • Added an insights service so an organization can review AI-agent interactions and completed work. Insights from that review feed back into solution design, gated by architect and user sign-off.
  • Alongside this, designed and built the platform itself: ~20 Go microservices on PostgreSQL, Flutter and React clients, deployed on Kubernetes.
  • AI agents scan the platform autonomously for security gaps and run scripted tests, covering API (Postman-style) and UI testing. The rest of the work stays supervised. No rogue agents, promise.
  • Building an AI-native enterprise platform that structures organizational data, workflows and responsibilities for both people and AI agents.
  • Models accountability through RACI, allowing human and AI participants to take different operational roles, including Responsible, Accountable, Consulted and Informed. AI agents can also take controlled approval roles where the organization assigns that responsibility.
  • Extended the organizational and operational-risk themes from my Executive MBA thesis into software, making roles, processes and controls explicit and machine-readable.
  • Structures enterprise context so LLM interactions use more relevant information instead of repeatedly processing large amounts of unstructured content.
Verified expert

Max B.

View profile

Senior UX Architect & Certified Product Owner

Frankfurt am Main
Max B.

Last position:

Customer Portal (Telecommunications) at Freelance Senior UX Architect

  • Drove key experience streams in the redesign of a large-scale telecommunications e-commerce platform focusing on mobile plan selection, product configuration, and digital contract completion.
  • Delivered scalable Figma-based white-label solutions within a multinational Scrum setup to enable efficient multi-brand rollout.
Verified expert

Fred H.

View profile

Senior Java Architect and Developer | Domain Architect (DDD, Knowledge Systems)

Munich
Fred H.

Last position:

Software Architect and Developer at Personal project

  • Recurring problem in my own AI-assisted projects: requirements analysis, use cases, and architecture decisions can be created quickly with AI support, but remain difficult to follow and scattered across Markdown files – knowledge is lost as soon as it is no longer in the context window. arknet turns requirements engineering and architecture knowledge into structured, verifiable data instead of plain text: requirements, use cases, and architecture decisions form a consistently linked knowledge graph, traceable from requirement to architecture decision – queryable by both people and AI agents. Technically based on RDF/OWL and a custom MCP server.

  • Result: Working MCP daemon, Docker image published automatically to GHCR, nine hexagonal modules, eleven ADRs (including an Open-Core licensing model). Requirements engineering and Ubiquitous Language hexagons are active. Public as a Community Edition under Apache-2.0 since 07/2026 (github.com/kogn-io/arknet), together with the Claude Code plugin and GHCR image; Open-Core model.

  • Label: Java, Maven, RDF, RDF4J, OWL, SPARQL, Model Context Protocol, Spring AI, Docker, GitHub, Git, Claude Code, Obsidian, DDD, Hexagonal Architecture, ArchUnit, JUnit, AssertJ, Interface Development, Software Architecture, Continuous Integration, Knowledge Management

Verified expert

Martin R.

View profile

Principal AI Product Engineer

Bamberg
Martin R.

Last position:

Principal Fullstack Engineer / Tech Lead Fullstack Applications at Procure Ai Ltd

Procure Ai builds a procurement platform with tools to optimise purchasing and supplier management, delivering real-time analytics, cost-saving insights, and automated workflows. A common data model integrates and enriches data from multiple ERP and e-procurement systems including Ivalua, SAP, Coupa, WPS, and Jaggaer.

06/2025 – TODAY:

  • Architecting and building a new AI-native procurement platform with document intelligence, an agent orchestration layer using Mastra and LLM-based workflow automation across supplier, intake and category management use-cases
  • Shipped agentic engineering workflows across the development team, enabling LLM-assisted code generation and review automation, measurably reducing cycle time on repetitive development tasks
  • Migrating the Design System from Material UI to shadcn/ui with Tailwind, improving consistency and reducing frontend build overhead
  • Staying hands-on across frontend, backend and AI features while the engineering team grew from 10 to 20+ engineers: hiring, onboarding, 1:1s and mentoring

06/2020 – 06/2025:

  • Joining as the first engineer after the two founders; shaping platform architecture and product vision from scratch in close collaboration with the CTO, growing the platform to serve 10 enterprise customers
  • Leading fullstack feature development on the core procurement platform, with focus on Analytics, Search, and Autonomous Negotiations use-cases: defining MVP scope, aligning technical decisions to customer outcomes, and cutting work that wasn't delivering value
  • Challenged a field-based configuration request for Autonomous Negotiations and instead built a node-based rule builder matching how category managers think in conditions and branches; later reused across other workflow and decision configuration use-cases
  • Designing and implementing multi-tenant authentication and fine-grained authorisation based on organisational units
  • Architecting and building a multi-tenant Admin Application for managing customer installations across environments, covering configuration, feature flags, and i18n
  • Creating and maintaining a custom Design System built on Material UI, used across the full product
  • Setting up and maintaining CI/CD pipeline and full QA suite (linting, unit, integration, and e2e testing)
  • Architecting and implementing a multi-environment release process using Helm and Helmfile; owning infrastructure as code across AWS and Azure
  • Researching and piloting new tools and frameworks; making build-vs-buy decisions to balance velocity, cost, and long-term maintainability
  • Grew the engineering team from 4 to 10+ engineers, mentoring engineers and building a culture of ownership, code review and iterative delivery

Technologies: TypeScript, JavaScript, React, Node.js, Fastify, GraphQL, GraphQL Codegen, GraphQL Mesh, GraphQL Yoga, Hasura, Apollo Client, REST, CubeJS, PostgreSQL, Prisma, Elasticsearch, Meilisearch, Typesense, Kafka, Avro, Karapace, Kubernetes, Docker, Terraform, OpenTofu, Helm, Helmfile, GitLab CI, Keycloak, Better-Auth, OpenFGA, Nx, Vite, Vitest, Playwright, Testing Library, Storybook, Chromatic, Material UI, shadcn/ui, Tailwind, React Flow, recharts, i18next, Backstage, Grafana, Sentry, Zod, Claude Code, Codex, Mastra, Vercel AI SDK, Vercel AI Elements, AWS, Azure

Discover over 15,000 top freelancers

Statistics of experts using Model Context Protocol

Aggregated from the professional profiles of matched freelancers.

Experience

16 years

Model Context Protocol experts in Germany have 16 years of professional experience on average.

Position duration

1.9 years

Model Context Protocol experts in Germany stay in a single position for 1.9 years on average.

Positions per freelancer

11

Model Context Protocol experts in Germany have completed 11 positions on average over the course of their careers.

Top business areas

Information Technology, Product Development, Project Management

Model Context Protocol experts in Germany have gathered most of their hands-on project experience in Information Technology, Product Development, and Project Management.

Top industries

Information Technology, Banking and Finance, Retail

Model Context Protocol experts in Germany are most in demand in Information Technology, Banking and Finance, and Retail.

Certification focus areas

Information Technology, Product Development, Project Management

Model Context Protocol experts in Germany earn their certifications most often in Information Technology, Product Development, and Project Management.

Bachelor's degree or higher

96%

96% of Model Context Protocol experts in Germany hold at least a Bachelor's degree.

Master's degree or higher

66%

66% of Model Context Protocol experts in Germany hold at least a Master's degree.

Doctorate

11%

11% of Model Context Protocol experts in Germany have a doctorate (PhD).

Certifications per freelancer

2

Model Context Protocol experts in Germany hold 2 professional certifications on average.

Most common languages

English, German, French

Model Context Protocol experts in Germany most often speak English, German, and French.

Speak two or more languages

96%

96% of Model Context Protocol experts in Germany speak two or more languages.

Based on our profile pool as of 29 Oct 2026.

Daily rate distribution

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
3% of Model Context Protocol experts in Germany charge less than €400 per day.
45% of Model Context Protocol experts in Germany charge between €400 and €800 per day.
43% of Model Context Protocol experts in Germany charge between €800 and €1200 per day.
5% of Model Context Protocol experts in Germany charge between €1200 and €1600 per day.
3% of Model Context Protocol experts in Germany charge €1600 or more per day.
<€400 €400-​800 €800-​1200 €1200-​1600 €1600+

The chart shows how the daily rates of experts in this technology in Germany are distributed, based on recent contracts on our platform. Each bar covers a rate range — its height shows the share of experts charging within that range.

Discover detailed Model Context Protocol rate benchmarks:

Explore rate insights

Average rates of experts in Germany using Model Context Protocol

Rates are based on recent contracts and do not include FRATCH margin.

1000
750
500
250
Rate comparison chart
Daily rate avg. 783 €

The average daily rate is the mean of all daily rates from recent contracts of comparable freelancers on our platform.

1000
750
500
250
Rate comparison chart
Median rate 800 €

The median daily rate is the middle value of all daily rates — half of comparable freelancers charge less, half charge more. Unlike the average, it is barely affected by outliers.

Calculated based on our freelancers’ daily rates as of 29 Oct 2026. Actual rates may vary depending on seniority level, experience, skill specialization, project complexity, and engagement length.

Model Context Protocol experts industry focus

See which industries our matched freelancers work in most often — every figure is calculated live from the freelancers on FRATCH.

  • Information Technology (100%)
  • Banking and Finance (45%)
  • Retail (41%)
  • Professional Services (40%)
  • Manufacturing (36%)
  • Automotive (35%)
  • Healthcare (35%)
  • Education (28%)

Please note that freelancers can work across multiple industries, so percentages overlap.

About the technology

What MCP is

Model Context Protocol, commonly called MCP, is an open standard for connecting AI applications with external data, tools and services. It defines a consistent way for a host application to discover capabilities, request context and invoke actions without building a separate integration for every system.

What it builds

MCP supports AI assistants and agents that need reliable access to operational information or controlled actions. Typical outcomes include:

  • Assistants that search internal knowledge bases
  • Agents that work with files, databases and APIs
  • Tool integrations for customer support and operations
  • Controlled workflows across enterprise applications

Ecosystem and tooling

The ecosystem includes MCP hosts, clients and servers, with SDKs commonly available for TypeScript, Python and other languages. Specialists work with transport options, capability discovery, tool and resource definitions, authentication, permission policies, logging and structured error handling. They also assess server packages and connectors before bringing them into production.

When companies need specialists

Companies bring in freelance expertise when an AI proof of concept must become a dependable product, or when many internal systems need a consistent integration layer. A specialist can define the server boundary, connect legacy services, protect sensitive context and establish tests for tool calls. Germany-based teams may also value professionals who can collaborate on-site, remotely or in both English and German.

Delivery and integration work

MCP projects often touch identity management, API design, data governance and observability. Strong professionals can map business permissions to available tools, separate read access from actions, manage session state and integrate with hosts such as desktop assistants, coding environments or custom enterprise applications. They document setup and handover clearly.

What strong professionals bring

Look for hands-on evidence of secure tool exposure, reliable context retrieval and thoughtful failure handling. Strong specialists understand that an MCP server is not automatically safe because it follows a standard; they validate inputs, limit permissions, protect secrets and record meaningful audit events. They can explain trade-offs between MCP, direct APIs, plugins and proprietary connectors, then measure quality through useful tests and real user workflows.

Published on:
FRATCH GPT

FRATCH GPT delivers freelancer proposals with clear reasoning and transparent pricing in minutes, helping your hiring department quickly and compliantly find the best talent.

Give it a try:

Try FRATCH GPT

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers to the questions that come up most around Model Context Protocol.

Model Context Protocol is used to connect AI applications with external tools, resources and data sources through a consistent interface. It can support knowledge retrieval, file access, database queries and controlled business actions.

MCP provides a shared interaction pattern for AI hosts, clients and servers, while a direct API integration is usually designed for one application or workflow. MCP can reduce repeated integration work, but direct APIs may remain simpler for narrow, highly controlled use cases.

A strong Model Context Protocol professional should understand API design, authentication, permission models, data protection and observability. Experience with TypeScript or Python, databases, cloud services and AI application orchestration is also useful.

MCP work does not depend on a fixed project size. A small proof of concept may need focused integration expertise, while a production rollout requires deeper knowledge of security, versioning, testing, monitoring and operational ownership.

Model Context Protocol projects are often suitable for remote collaboration because specifications, code reviews and integration testing can be handled online. On-site workshops can still help with security reviews, domain mapping and alignment across German business teams.

Ask how the MCP professional handles authentication, tool permissions, untrusted inputs, secrets and failed actions. Request concrete examples of server design, testing and monitoring rather than relying on familiarity with the protocol name alone.

MCP can expose sensitive data or powerful actions if servers and tools are granted excessive permissions. Other risks include unclear ownership, weak input validation, unsafe third-party connectors and missing audit trails, so security controls should be designed before broad access is enabled.

A capable Model Context Protocol specialist can explain the chosen host, client and server architecture in clear terms. They should show repeatable tests, documented capabilities, careful error handling and a practical plan for deployment, monitoring and future changes.

The average hourly rate of freelancers in Germany who have used Model Context Protocol in their recent projects is 98 €, which corresponds to a daily rate of about 783 € based on an 8-hour working day.

Of the freelancers in Germany who have used Model Context Protocol in their recent projects, 96% hold at least a Bachelor's degree, 66% hold at least a Master's degree, and 11% hold a doctorate.

On average, freelancers in Germany who have used Model Context Protocol in their recent projects have 16 years of professional experience, with a single engagement typically lasting around 1.9 years.

The most common languages among freelancers in Germany who have used Model Context Protocol in their recent projects are English (98%), German (98%), and French (11%).

The most common industries among freelancers in Germany who have used Model Context Protocol in their recent projects are Information Technology (100%), Banking and Finance (45%), and Retail (41%).

The most common business areas among freelancers in Germany who have used Model Context Protocol in their recent projects are Information Technology (100%), Product Development (96%), and Project Management (57%).

Main locations of FRATCH Experts, who have recently used Model Context Protocol

Our freelancers and interim experts are at home across the DACH region — available on-site in the major business hubs or fully remote. Choose a location to discover matched specialists, local market insights and up-to-date availability.

Berlin Hamburg Munich Cologne Frankfurt Stuttgart Dusseldorf Leipzig Dortmund Essen Bremen Dresden Hanover Nuremberg

Request a free demo

Get in touch with the FRATCH team and we will get back to you within 4 hours.

Contact form

Would you rather directly get in touch?
We always have the time for a call or email!

FRATCH CEO avatar

Philipp Thomaschewski

FRATCH CEO

LinkedInFRATCH