
Red Teaming Experts in Germany
matched in minutes with vetted, available freelancersHire experts who simulate real adversaries, test identity and cloud defenses, and turn attack paths into clear remediation plans. FRATCH uses fast, precise AI matching to connect you with vetted, available freelancers for focused security engagements.
Meet FRATCH Experts in Germany, who have recently used Red Teaming
Gabin Maxime N.
Last position:
Multi-Agent R&D Pipeline (3 Custom Agents) at Independent Project
Claude Code subagents, MCP, Pydantic V2, pytest, bandit
Designed and shipped 3 specialized agents that hand work down a line: a research agent writes a cited implementation spec, a coding agent builds the modular code and its tests, a review agent ranks findings by severity and applies the fixes. Each handoff is a structured document, so no stage depends on another agent's context window.
Connected the research agent to an academic-research MCP server (Semantic Scholar, ArXiv, Hugging Face Hub, citation snowballing) so every reference traces to a tool result rather than the model. Gated commits behind ruff, mypy, pytest and bandit, required human sign-off before installs and commits, and persisted session state on disk so long runs survive a context reset.
Dirk P.
Last position:
Freelance Cyber Defense Lead & KRITIS/NIS2 Consultant | AI Security Architect at Self-Employed
Situation: Increasing demand for privacy-compliant AI solutions for clients in the KRITIS and mid-market sector that need to analyze sensitive media content (audio, video, documents) without sending data to public cloud LLMs.
Task: Design, deployment, and secure operation of a fully self-hosted AI infrastructure including a custom-built digital management platform for automated media analysis.
Action: Architected and implemented a multi-tier platform on hardened Proxmox infrastructure with frontend (Nuxt 3, Vue 3, TypeScript, Tailwind 4), backend (Laravel 13, PHP 8.4, Sanctum), data storage (PostgreSQL 16, MongoDB 7), caching/queuing (Redis 7, Laravel Queue), AI workers (Python 3.11, Whisper, DeepFace, Librosa), scheduling (Laravel Scheduler/Cron), and local LLMs (Gemma, DeepSeek, Qwen, Mistral, LLaMA, Phi) via OpenWebUI with segmented network access, API hardening, and audit logging following BSI recommendations.
Result: Fully GDPR-compliant, on-premises AI platform with zero data leakage to third parties.
Task: Overall responsibility as an external Head of Cyber Security / CISO-as-a-Service for the design, implementation, and continuous improvement of ISMS according to ISO 27001, BSI IT-Grundschutz, and NIS2.
Action: Built and managed Cyber Defense Centers (CDC) with SOC operations, integrated SIEM solutions (Splunk, Graylog), established risk-based vulnerability management (Qualys, Nessus, OpenVAS), and conducted regular infrastructure, application, and physical penetration tests.
Result: Audit-ready ISMS for multiple clients and a 60% reduction in critical vulnerabilities within 90 days.
Task: Design and execution of NIS2 assessments and operational roll-out plans for KRITIS operators.
Action: Developed an online assessment tool for automated identification of individual weakness profiles, implemented ISMS optimizations, penetration testing, awareness programs, GRC suite deployment, and delivered C-level presentations.
Result: Accelerated the consulting process by 50% and successfully prepared multiple clients for NIS2 compliance.
Task: Incident commander for crisis response, forensics, and business recovery in ransomware attacks and APT campaigns.
Action: Coordinated with state and federal police (LKA, BKA), performed forensic analysis (OSForensics, Wireshark, Kali Linux), executed disaster recovery and BCM strategies, and developed BTC extortion response strategies.
Result: 100% recovery rate within defined RTO windows and sustainable post-incident security architectures.
Action: Planned, built, and operated a hardened multi-VM infrastructure (Proxmox, 15+ VMs) with web and mail servers, Graylog, OPNsense firewalls, CRM/ERP and LLM instances, network segmentation, DDoS mitigation, automated patch management, and backup strategies.
Result: >99.5% uptime over 20+ years and zero compromises.
Action: Designed coordinated phishing campaigns with five levels of difficulty, developed e-trainings and webinars in a PDCA cycle, and led red and blue teams.
Result: Phishing click rate reduced from 35% to under 5% within three campaign cycles.
Samuel K.
Last position:
Founder & Agentic AI Engineer at Agentakt LLC
Independent engineering practice focused on custom AI systems, production delivery, and fractional technical leadership.
Selected client engagement: Scalutions
Role: Serve as fractional CTO and hands-on technical lead, responsible for the architecture and agentic infrastructure behind its managed B2B outbound operation.
Product: Designed and built OutboundLoop, an agentic SDR operating system for research, qualification, personalized outreach, campaign management, human approvals, measurement, and continuous improvement.
Scope: Own the full system lifecycle—from business processes and agent behavior to context design, model routing, integrations, evaluation, telemetry, reliability, cost control, and production operations.
Daniel F.
Last position:
AI Researcher & LLM Evaluation – Conventional Paradigm Test (CPT) at Private
Conventional Paradigm Test (CPT) – AI Evaluation & LLM Research
Development of an experimental evaluation approach to examine “paradigmatic closure” in Large Language Models — that is, the question of how far LLMs can recognize the basic assumptions, values, and limits of the paradigms within which they generate answers.
Design and testing of an additional approach to classic AI benchmarks that does not primarily measure factual correctness or task performance, but instead examines a model’s ability to recognize alternative perspectives, make implicit assumptions visible, and reflect on the limits of its own answer or interpretation framework.
Focus areas: development of evaluation criteria and test questions · LLM evaluation and comparative model analysis · prompt and response analysis · qualitative classification of model answers · study of epistemic compression and value leakage · benchmark and literature research · development of structured assessment and analysis methods
As part of CPT, existing AI evaluation approaches and benchmarks were analyzed, and a minimalist test protocol was developed that classifies model answers by response patterns such as DIRECT, CLARIFY, PLURALIST, REFUSE, and META-AWARE. TruthfulQA was used as the basis for experimental application and comparison with existing reference answers.
Technologies & Methods: Large Language Models (LLMs) · Generative AI · Prompt Engineering · AI Evaluation · TruthfulQA · Benchmark Analysis · Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation · Qualitative Content Analysis · Research & Literature Review
Baris E.
Last position:
Founder / Product & Security Architect at Pirpirik
- Perform secure code reviews and provide secure-coding guidance across the application and platform architecture.
- Engineer infrastructure security and design security-monitoring architecture, incident-response playbooks and Security-by-Design controls.
Enrique G.
Last position:
Security Architect at Capgemini
I implemented a Zero-Trust architecture for robust, military-grade maritime container mini data centers based on VMware & Tanzu to support containerized GIS workloads for ground forces. The main focus was on securing communications, workload protection, and data access in contested electronic battle environments affected by jamming, interception, signal manipulation, and constantly changing operational conditions. I designed and architected use cases so that every element of workload, identity, and system could continue to operate independently and securely even in degraded or disrupted scenarios. In parallel, I defined the enterprise and solution security architecture with LeanIX, Bizzdesign, and HOPEX as enterprise architecture, repository, and governance platforms to maintain architecture inventory, relationships, traceability, target pictures, and security governance in complex environments. For the architectural designs, I used Sparx Enterprise Architect to describe formal architecture views, interfaces, trust boundaries, and system architecture in both IT and OT environments. IriusRisk was used for threat modeling of the solution to identify architecture-driven risks, derive security requirements, and detect countermeasures and design gaps directly from the solution models. Risk and compliance management was supported with Archer. Architecture decisions, control gaps, and operational risks were translated into controlled governance and auditable compliance measures. For documentation, collaboration, and visual design, I used Confluence to maintain Architecture Decision Records, Security Blueprints, and workflows. I used Lucidchart and draw.io to create design artifacts tailored to stakeholders. I also defined OT security concepts with support from electrical and mechanical engineers in the areas of oil, vehicle onboard systems, rail, power plants, pharma, gas turbines, and nuclear technology. I created the end-to-end OT security strategy, starting with global policy, developed into standards and procedures, and finally aligned with Bell-LaPadula, Purdue Model, SABSA, TOGAF ADM, CENELEC 50701, IEC 62443, and NIST standards. In addition, I worked with engineering team leads to identify critical KBP assets and place them under protective measures that segmented SCADA, PLC, and HMI assets. I drove collaboration between Security, IT, and OT teams to create standardized workflows and use cases for the OT security solution catalog, while integrating Defense-in-Depth and Zero-Trust principles into operational environments. A key part of my work was integrating multidisciplinary engineering, security, and operations stakeholders into a unified security blueprinting strategy and ensuring that architecture, threat modeling, governance, and documentation were technically strong and operationally practical.
Amar Sankar K.
Last position:
Prompt & Eval Playbook for CRM Conversations (Personal)
- Designed a compact framework to generate prompt–response sets for CRM lifecycle scenarios (onboarding, activation, retention, reactivation).
- Included adversarial variants (ambiguous requests, conflicting instructions, policy traps).
- Created a scoring rubric for factuality, tone, and coherence.
- Developed a lightweight guideline for annotator alignment and disagreement resolution.
Kennedy A.
Last position:
Cybersecurity Trainee at CYBERDEFENDERS
- Completed 25+ hands-on labs focusing on digital forensics, incident response, and advanced threat hunting techniques.
- Earned top-tier badges in malware analysis, enterprise log analysis, and threat intelligence gathering.
- Developed specialised skills in forensic report writing and evidence collection methodologies to support incident investigations.
André B.
Last position:
External Attack Surface Assessment & Cybersecurity Readiness Checks at Graydaxe Cybersecurity GmbH
- Conducting cybersecurity readiness checks based on an in-house assessment methodology
- Analyzing the external attack surface using the Graydaxe EASM platform
- Assessing maturity levels and deriving prioritized recommendations for action
Sergey K.
Last position:
Managing Director Cybersecurity at CBA-Cybersecurity and Business Advisory GmbH
- Development of comprehensive services in cybersecurity, IT governance, and AI
- Building and delivering strategic security solutions such as vCISO service, ISMS, SOC-as-a-Service (SIEM, SOAR, use cases, playbooks, threat hunting, incident response), AI-driven risk and compliance tools, and frameworks for outsourcing and third-party risks
- Supporting companies in meeting regulatory requirements and certifications (ISMS, NIS-2, DORA, CRA, KRITIS, ISO 27001, TISAX, BSI IT Baseline Protection, EU AI Act)
- Promoting innovations in cybersecurity automation, AI governance, and secure digital transformation
- Responsible for company growth, client relations, and strategic partnerships
Valeri M.
Last position:
Associate Partner - Information Security Consulting at Insentis GmbH
- Improvement of the Information Security Management System (ISMS) based on ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, B3S, TISAX and BSI IT Baseline Protection
- Conducting comprehensive gap analyses to identify gaps and derive action plans according to the above standards and regulations; management and KPIs
- Data Loss Prevention strategy and implementation using MS Purview
- Vulnerability and patch management, security monitoring
- Risk analysis and threat modeling using the STRIDE methodology
- Development of vendor risk assessments, implementation of risk classifications, conducting supplier assessments and implementing technical monitoring solutions (e.g. Security ScoreCard)
- Securing cloud environments (AWS and Azure); expertise in CSPM/CNAPP (Wiz), cloud migration, secure CI/CD pipelines, container security and best practices in AWS, Azure and Office 365
- Application security: penetration testing, DevSecOps, OWASP, pre-commit hooks, key and secret management, IDE plugins, static source code analysis, dependency checks, container scanning, vulnerability management, CIS benchmarks and compliance
- Security assessment and hardening according to CIS benchmarks and cloud conformity in AWS, Office 365 and Azure
Anton R.
Last position:
AI-Engineer at Publicly traded company, industrial safety technology
- Designed and implemented the agent-based AI architecture for a company-wide platform to securely deploy LLM-based agents
- Designed and implemented end-to-end RAG pipelines from multiple sources: document preprocessing, chunking strategies for different document types, embeddings, retrieval with re-ranking, and robust prompt orchestration
- Developed a modular context engineering framework with skill architecture, context isolation, and dynamic resource management; human-in-the-loop control for enterprise tool integrations
- Built the CI/CD pipeline, testing strategy, tracing on the software side as well as automated LLM and agent evaluations, red team testing and tracing, and handed over to a reproducible production environment (ISO27001 and SOC2 compliant)
Maryam M.
Last position:
AI Red Team Engineer at Applause
- Performed security assessments and penetration testing on Microsoft AI models for text, image, and video generation.
- Conducted prompt injection attacks through diverse input vectors, including crafted text, steganographic images, and manipulated visual elements (e.g., varying opacity and embedded content).
Seyed Farhad M.
Last position:
Senior Product Security Engineer at Delivery Hero
- Developed a custom tool using the Mistral 7B LLM to scan, validate and report security vulnerabilities.
- Security tested AI agents, bots, and other LLMs with a focus on prompt injection, model inversion, data poisoning, EDR/AV bypass and evasion techniques, membership inference, model evasion, overfitting to malicious inputs and contextual manipulation.
- Onboarded repositories to SAST solutions for security scanning, implemented secrets scanning, DAST, SCA, and utilized ZAP for DAST in CI/CD pipelines.
- Engaged in security awareness trainings, developed CTF challenges and training materials to enhance developer security knowledge.
- Planned and executed bi-annual red teaming operations based on the MITRE ATT&CK framework and led internal and external pentests based on the OWASP Top 10 framework for 70+ applications worldwide, resulting in detection, reporting, and remediation of hundreds of vulnerabilities.
- Triaged HackerOne reports.
Claudia H.
Last position:
Founder & AI Product Lead at Unforgotten
- Conceived, built and iterated an applied-AI MVP that turns in-depth audio interviews into structured, long-form narrative outputs across multiple genres (e.g. memoir, institutional knowledge, thematic essays) using agentic orchestration and multi-step reasoning.
- Designed and implemented core workflows in a Next.js-based stack, working with structured representations (JSON and other formats), retrieval-augmented generation and emerging knowledge graph structures to maintain context and consistency over long documents.
- Defined and tested agent behaviors across realistic storytelling scenarios, including ideal user journeys, edge cases and failure modes, with explicit criteria for coherence, factual alignment and user intent satisfaction.
- Currently running targeted user tests with selected partners to validate use cases and inform the next product iterations.
Discover over 15,000 top freelancers
Statistics of experts using Red Teaming
Aggregated from the professional profiles of matched freelancers.
Experience
16 years

Position duration
2.9 years

Positions per freelancer
9

Top business areas
Information Technology, Product Development, Quality Assurance

Top industries
Information Technology, Professional Services, Education

Certification focus areas
Information Technology, Audit, Legal
Bachelor's degree or higher
100%
Master's degree or higher
44%
Doctorate
17%

Certifications per freelancer
6

Most common languages
English, German, Spanish

Speak two or more languages
94%
Based on our profile pool as of 19 Sep 2026.
Daily rate distribution
The chart shows how the daily rates of freelancers in this technology in Germany are distributed, based on recent contracts on our platform. Each bar covers a rate range — its height shows how many freelancers charge within that range.
Average rates of experts in Germany using Red Teaming
Rates are based on recent contracts and do not include FRATCH margin.
The average daily rate is the mean of all daily rates from recent contracts of comparable freelancers on our platform.
The median daily rate is the middle value of all daily rates — half of comparable freelancers charge less, half charge more. Unlike the average, it is barely affected by outliers.
Calculated based on our freelancers’ daily rates as of 19 Sep 2026. Actual rates may vary depending on seniority level, experience, skill specialization, project complexity, and engagement length.
Red Teaming experts industry focus
See which industries our matched freelancers work in most often — every figure is calculated live from the freelancers on FRATCH.
- Information Technology (94%)
- Professional Services (56%)
- Education (39%)
- Banking and Finance (39%)
- Automotive (33%)
- Manufacturing (33%)
- Energy (28%)
- Media and Entertainment (28%)
Please note that freelancers can work across multiple industries, so percentages overlap.
About the technology
What Red Teaming does
Red Teaming is an authorized security exercise that imitates a capable attacker against an organization’s people, processes and technology. The goal is to expose realistic paths to sensitive systems, data or business impact before a criminal group finds them. It combines technical testing with careful planning, stealth and evidence.
Where it applies
Red teams assess environments that broad vulnerability scans cannot fully represent. Typical engagements include:
- Testing external attack surfaces and internet-facing applications
- Simulating identity compromise, phishing and privilege escalation
- Assessing cloud control planes, endpoints and network segmentation
- Measuring detection and response against a live intrusion scenario
Methods and tooling
Professionals combine reconnaissance, social engineering, web and API testing, exploitation, lateral movement and post-exploitation analysis. Tooling may include Cobalt Strike, Sliver, Metasploit, Burp Suite, BloodHound and custom scripts, selected according to the rules of engagement. Strong practice also covers operational security and evidence handling.
When companies engage experts
Freelance expertise helps when an internal security team needs an independent view, a major cloud or identity change requires validation, or leadership wants to test incident response under pressure. In Germany, specialists may support regulated industries and distributed teams remotely, with on-site work where physical access or local coordination is part of the scope.
What a strong engagement delivers
A quality engagement starts with explicit authorization, scope, objectives, safety limits and escalation contacts. The final deliverables connect each finding to attack-path evidence, business impact and practical remediation. A useful debrief also shows which controls detected the activity, which signals were missed and how defenders can verify improvements.
Choosing the right specialist
Look for professionals who can explain adversary simulation without confusing it with a checklist-based penetration test. Relevant strengths include offensive security, cloud and identity architecture, secure coding, threat intelligence, detection engineering and incident response. Ask how they protect production systems, communicate during live operations and separate confirmed evidence from assumptions.
Frequently asked questions
The facts hiring teams ask for most often when it comes to Red Teaming.
Red Teaming is used to test whether a realistic attacker could move from an initial foothold to a meaningful business objective. It evaluates prevention, detection and response across technology, processes and people, rather than examining isolated vulnerabilities alone.
Red Teaming usually pursues a defined objective while limiting disclosure to simulate real attacker behavior. A penetration test generally aims to identify as many weaknesses as possible within an agreed system scope, so the two activities can complement each other.
A strong Red Teaming specialist often combines offensive security with identity and access management, cloud security, web and API testing, threat intelligence and incident response. Knowledge of detection engineering helps them assess whether defensive teams see and contain the simulated intrusion.
Red Teaming requires enough experience to plan safely, adapt to changing defenses and distinguish evidence from speculation. The right level depends on the environment, objectives and risk tolerance, but the professional should be able to show disciplined rules of engagement and clear reporting.
Red Teaming can often be delivered remotely when systems, access and communications are prepared for secure collaboration. In Germany, on-site work may add value when the exercise includes physical security, local social engineering or close coordination with an internal response team.
A company should consider Red Teaming before a major security decision, after significant changes to cloud or identity infrastructure, or when it needs an independent test of detection and response. A freelancer can also provide focused expertise when an internal team lacks time or a specific offensive capability.
Good Red Teaming is authorized, controlled and tied to explicit objectives. Review whether the report explains attack paths, evidence, business impact, defensive observations and prioritized fixes, then check whether the professional can discuss limitations without overstating the result.
Before Red Teaming begins, agree on scope, objectives, prohibited actions, testing windows, emergency contacts, data handling and escalation rules. The engagement should also define how access is obtained, how evidence is stored and how findings will be validated after remediation.
The average hourly rate of freelancers in Germany who have used Red Teaming in their recent projects is 86 €, which corresponds to a daily rate of about 685 € based on an 8-hour working day.
Of the freelancers in Germany who have used Red Teaming in their recent projects, 100% hold at least a Bachelor's degree, 44% hold at least a Master's degree, and 17% hold a doctorate.
On average, freelancers in Germany who have used Red Teaming in their recent projects have 16 years of professional experience, with a single engagement typically lasting around 2.9 years.
The most common languages among freelancers in Germany who have used Red Teaming in their recent projects are English (100%), German (94%), and Spanish (17%).
The most common industries among freelancers in Germany who have used Red Teaming in their recent projects are Information Technology (94%), Professional Services (56%), and Education (39%).
The most common business areas among freelancers in Germany who have used Red Teaming in their recent projects are Information Technology (94%), Product Development (72%), and Quality Assurance (61%).
Main locations of FRATCH Experts, who have recently used Red Teaming
Our freelancers and interim experts are at home across the DACH region — available on-site in the major business hubs or fully remote. Choose a location to discover matched specialists, local market insights and up-to-date availability.
Request a free demo
Get in touch with the FRATCH team and we will get back to you within 4 hours.
Would you rather directly get in touch?
We always have the time for a call or email!

Berlin