Skip to main content
🇩🇪GDPR-compliant
Find the perfect

Polyspace Experts in Germany

in minutes from over 15,000 CVs with the power of AI

Hire experts who use Polyspace, Polyspace Code Prover, and Polyspace Bug Finder to analyze safety-critical code, review static analysis findings, and support verification work for embedded systems. Get fast, precise matching with vetted, available freelancers.

Meet FRATCH Experts in Germany, who have recently used Polyspace

Verified expert

S.r.k. Chandra

View profile

Embedded Software Engineer | Classic AUTOSAR & Real-Time Embedded Systems

Coburg
S.r.k. Chandra

Last position:

Senior Software Engineer at STEPPS GmbH / Motherson Dr. Schneider

Project: Intelligent Light Communication Software — Audi

  • Analysis and clarification of system requirements with the customer and translation into software architecture and design decisions
  • Architecture and implementation of CAN FD and SPI communication on NXP S32K312
  • Design and development of flash bootloader, flash driver, and boot manager for secure OTA-capable updates
  • Configuration of the AUTOSAR BSW architecture (Dcm, Dem, NvM, BswM, Os, Mcu, Port, Com stack, Rtc) for portability and maintainability
  • Design of the crypto stack (Csm, CryIf, Crypto) for secure flash and diagnostic data; integration of the NXP HSE core and wrapper layer
  • Integration of customer-specific modules (Sfd, Ivd, Npm) into the Vector AUTOSAR stack
  • Definition of the memory architecture: Memmap, CMake, and linker script configuration
  • Leading board bring-up for the Audi light demo platform; implementation of diagnostic routines and identifiers
Verified expert

Kusay Tomeh

View profile

Engineer

Rülzheim
Kusay Tomeh

Last position:

Freelance System & Software Architect - DNA-Extraction Robot at QIAGEN GmbH

  • System and software architecture for the QIA-symphony Connect DNA-extraction robot in Life Science / IVD automation.
  • Designed features and control logic for extraction, pipetting, lysis and eluate modules using C++, PLC/ST (Beckhoff IPC / TwinCAT 3) and model-based concepts.
  • Delivered ISO 13485-oriented requirements, architecture, unit/integration/regression tests and DHF/VEP/VER/TCL documentation.
  • Used Polarion, Jira, Confluence, Azure and AI-assisted documentation to improve traceability and engineering efficiency.
Verified expert

Oliver Ohly

View profile

Embedded Software Engineering - Automotive

Kaufbeuren
Oliver Ohly

Last position:

Embedded Software Architect at Automotive supplier

Stellar SR6 G7 line, 32-bit Arm® Cortex®-R52+ MCU.

  • MISRA-C, C99, Greenhills ARM compiler
  • Dassault AUTOSAR Builder
  • EB Tresos
  • Sparx Enterprise Architect 16.1
  • VS Code
  • Python xml, lxml, NumPy and Pandas

ISO 26262, ISO 21434, hypervisor, key management, HSM. Tooling & automation. LieberLieber LemonTree + Sparx EA. Jira, Confluence, SharePoint. Git/Github. DevOps through Jenkins & Conan.

Verified expert

Oleksii Kvasnikov

View profile

Software developer (freelance)

Rottenburg
Oleksii Kvasnikov

Last position:

Software developer (freelance) at Sasse Elektronik GmbH

  • Built custom Yocto Linux image with Docker support (NXP i.MX 6ULL)
  • Developed distributed Python application (web interface, gas/temp control)
  • Designed multiple docker containers for production and development
  • Wrote documentation per IEC 62304
Verified expert

Edda Nourbakhsh

View profile

Independent Software Developer

Aachen
Edda Nourbakhsh

Last position:

Independent Software Developer at Professional Programming

  • since 03.2025: development of new functionality, customer-specific adaptations and bug fixing of an ERP system in the inventory management area for medical products (Windows 11, Mumps, GT.M)

  • 09.2022–04.2024: creation of diagnostic routines for the entire vehicle fault memory and implementation of a diagnostic application for the after-sales area using PRODIS Automation (Windows 10, graphical J2EE platform, PRODIS Automation DSA)

  • 09.2020–06.2022: analysis of requirements, creation of concepts and specifications, software development in C, bug fixing, code reviews, module testing, integration, series maintenance according to PTC Integrity Tracker (microprocessor SAMA5, Linux, C, Visual Studio 15/19, Polyspace, MISRA, Integrity PTC, Jenkins, make/cmake)

  • 07.2019–11.2019: implementation and installation of customer-specific adjustments and extensions in the field of electronic payment transactions, preparation and execution of tests (Windows 7, Linux, C++, make, Eclipse, Git)

  • 01.2019–07.2019: software development of headlamp control units according to Automotive SPICE, reviews with QA (microcontroller Renesas RH850, C, Git, Green Hills Compiler/Linker, Visual Studio 2013, Rational ClearCase, ClearQuest, Vector CANoe)

  • 01.2017–12.2018: project management, software requirements analysis, development according to MISRA and HIS, QA plan, document reviews, configuration management, on-site support (Renesas RH850, C, Git, Visual Studio 2013, DOORS, ClearCase, ClearQuest, Vector CANoe)

  • 02.2013–10.2016: redesign and implementation of CAN/LIN restbus software and D-PDU API, development of various restbus adapters, feature extensions, FIBEX integration, driver control, D-PDU API interface, performance optimization, module tests, documentation, commissioning (Windows 7, C++11/98, Python 3.2, IronPython, Visual Studio 2010/2012/2013, Boost, Doxygen, ClearCase, Vector CANoe, D-Server Softing DTS 8)

  • 06.2011–09.2012: adaptation and maintenance of the MCVI Diagnostic Server according to ASAM MCD-3D 3.0.0 and ODX 2.2, development of diagnostic tools and user interfaces, transformation of ODX data, regression tests with CppUnit and JUnit (Windows 7, C++, Java)

  • 01.2010–05.2011: design, development and commissioning of a program for customer, project and product catalog management (Windows XP, Visual Basic .NET, Microsoft Access)

  • 04.2008–12.2009: programming of ODX data-based diagnostic routines, requirement documents and test specifications, simulation tests, maintenance and bug fixing (Windows XP, J2EE platform, Oracle)

  • 02.2007–12.2007: implementation of the framework for pattern design and management software, functional extensions, setup project (.NET, C++, Visual Studio 8, Microsoft Access, Windows XP)

Verified expert

Karl Spielberger

View profile

Hardware-related software development, code review, error analysis and expertise

Ramstein-Miesenbach
Karl Spielberger

Last position:

Software Consultant, Architect, and Developer at Forklift Truck Manufacturer

  • Consulting in all areas of software development such as architecture, inter- and intra-process communication, end-to-end validation

  • Monitoring and measuring resources such as runtime and memory usage

  • Specification of interface and implementation patterns as well as high-level and detailed specifications

  • Design and implementation of functional and safety software

  • Specification of unit tests and support of the integration and software tests in the HIL test department as part of software validation

  • Development of platform-independent control and regulation software for a fuel cell system (multi-processor 16-bit and multi-core 32-bit)

  • Development/concept design of state machines

  • Development/concept design of control algorithms

  • Development/concept design of inter-process safety communication

  • Development/concept design of basic software components for parameter, characteristic curve, and error management

  • Development of vehicle communication based on CAN

  • Development/concept design of commissioning, maintenance, and service interfaces via CAN and UDS diagnostics

  • Conducting validation and supporting external validation

  • Creating specifications for testing

Verified expert

Michael Beck

View profile

Developer/Consultant

Leonberg
Michael Beck

Last position:

Developer/Consultant at Fresenius Medical Care

  • Development of automated end-of-line tests (functional tests) for dialysis machines on a PLC test bench in a production environment
  • Introduction of new technology based on Vector vTestStudio, CANoe, and Siemens S7 PLC
  • Creating test concepts
  • Implementing test cases and libraries in CAPL and C#
  • Touch screen emulation and proprietary RPC (Remote Procedure Call) via CAN
  • Connecting to the PLC (Siemens Simatic)
  • Defining interfaces for device communication (vCDL)
  • Defining user interfaces and linking to the frontend (JSON)
  • Agile work using DevOps (Azure)
  • Skills: CAPL, .NET, C#, vCDL, CANOpen, DevOps, PLC
  • Tools used: Vector CANoe 18, vTestStudio 4, MS Azure DevOps, MS Visual Studio 2022, Mosquito MQTT, Git, Siemens TIA Portal
Verified expert

Konstantin Mirny

View profile

Architect, Software Developer

Hebertshausen
Konstantin Mirny

Last position:

Architect, Software Developer at IPG Photonics

  • Defined initial system and software architecture
  • Implemented application modules and hardware control layers
  • Built test and mock environments to support validation
  • Developed hardware drivers and low-level communication routines
  • Authored technical documentation for internal and external stakeholders
  • Tools: C/C++, QML, Linux, Windows, Raspberry PI, MQTT, CAN, Serial

Discover over 15,000 top freelancers

Statistics of experts using Polyspace

Aggregated from the professional profiles of matched freelancers.

Experience

23 years

Position duration

2.6 years

Positions per freelancer

12

Top business areas

Information Technology, Product Development, Quality Assurance

Top industries

Automotive, Manufacturing, Healthcare

Certification focus areas

Information Technology, Product Development, Research and Development

Bachelor's degree or higher

88%

Master's degree or higher

63%

Doctorate

13%

Certifications per freelancer

1

Most common languages

German, English, French

Speak two or more languages

100%

Based on our profile pool as of 30 Aug 2026.

Daily rate distribution

0 1 2 3 4
<€600 €640-​680 €800+

The chart shows how the daily rates of freelancers in this technology in Germany are distributed, based on recent contracts on our platform. Each bar covers a rate range — its height shows how many freelancers charge within that range.

Average rates of experts in Germany using Polyspace

Rates are based on recent contracts and do not include FRATCH margin.

800
600
400
200
Rate comparison chart
Daily rate avg. 720 €

The average daily rate is the mean of all daily rates from recent contracts of comparable freelancers on our platform.

800
600
400
200
Rate comparison chart
Median rate 720 €

The median daily rate is the middle value of all daily rates — half of comparable freelancers charge less, half charge more. Unlike the average, it is barely affected by outliers.

Calculated based on our freelancers’ daily rates as of 30 Aug 2026. Actual rates may vary depending on seniority level, experience, skill specialization, project complexity, and engagement length.

About the technology

Static analysis for critical code

Polyspace is a static analysis tool from MathWorks used to check source code without running it. It helps teams find run-time errors, prove the absence of certain defects, and review risky paths before software reaches testing or release. It is common in embedded and safety-critical work.

What specialists deliver

  • Code Prover analysis for unreachable or provably safe code
  • Bug Finder runs for defect detection and review
  • Report interpretation for development and safety teams
  • Clean-up guidance for warnings, assumptions, and false positives

Where it fits

Companies use Polyspace on firmware, control software, and other C and C++ code that must stay stable under strict constraints. It is often part of verification flows for automotive, aerospace, rail, industrial control, and medical products. In Germany, it is especially relevant where embedded software must satisfy detailed review and documentation needs.

Ecosystem and workflow

Polyspace often sits next to Simulink, Embedded Coder, and existing CI checks. Strong specialists know how to tune analysis settings, manage target-specific code, and make results useful for reviewers who do not want raw tool output. They also understand how code style and compiler choices affect findings.

When companies bring in help

Teams usually look for freelance Polyspace experts when analysis results are noisy, release schedules are tight, or a certification review is approaching. External specialists help set up projects, explain findings, support remediation, and train internal teams to use the tool correctly. This is useful when the in-house team has the code but needs deeper verification knowledge.

What good experts do

  • Read results in the context of the target system
  • Distinguish real defects from acceptable deviations
  • Work with C, C++, and embedded build setups
  • Document decisions clearly for engineering and quality teams
  • Collaborate well in German or remote international teams
Published on:
FRATCH GPT

FRATCH GPT delivers freelancer proposals with clear reasoning and transparent pricing in minutes, helping your hiring department quickly and compliantly find the best talent.

Give it a try:

Try FRATCH GPT

Frequently asked questions

Questions about Polyspace? Start with the answers below.

Polyspace is used to analyze source code before it runs, mainly in embedded and safety-critical systems. Teams use it to find defects, check code paths, and support evidence for verification work. It is especially useful when software must be reviewed carefully before release.

Polyspace goes beyond basic linting because it can reason about code paths and, in some cases, prove that certain run-time errors cannot occur. Compared with lighter static analyzers, it is often chosen when teams need stronger evidence and clearer review traces. It is not a replacement for testing, but it adds depth to verification.

A strong Polyspace specialist usually knows C and C++, embedded builds, and how compiler settings influence analysis results. They should also understand how to interpret warnings, handle false positives, and write clear remediation notes. Experience with safety-focused review work is a major plus.

For a small setup or review task, a Polyspace expert with solid hands-on experience is often enough. For tool rollout, complex code bases, or certification-facing work, you want someone who has handled analysis strategy and reporting before. The more critical the system, the more important proven verification experience becomes.

Yes, much of the Polyspace work can be done remotely because the core tasks are analysis, review, and documentation. In Germany, on-site time is mainly useful when the expert needs to work closely with hardware teams or quality stakeholders. Many projects use a mix of remote work and focused workshops.

Ask which parts of Polyspace they have used, whether they worked with Code Prover or Bug Finder, and how they handled noisy results. It also helps to ask how they support teams with documentation and remediation. A good answer should sound specific to your code, not generic.

Look for someone who explains findings in plain language and ties each result back to the target system. A good Polyspace expert can show how they reduced false positives, improved review flow, and helped teams make decisions faster. Clear examples from embedded or safety-critical work matter more than tool names alone.

Polyspace is often used alongside Simulink, Embedded Coder, code review practices, and other static analysis checks. Specialists who understand the full workflow can move between model-based development, generated code, and hand-written C or C++. That broader context makes the analysis much more useful.

The average hourly rate of freelancers in Germany who have used Polyspace in their recent projects is 90 €, which corresponds to a daily rate of about 720 € based on an 8-hour working day.

Of the freelancers in Germany who have used Polyspace in their recent projects, 88% hold at least a Bachelor's degree, 63% hold at least a Master's degree, and 13% hold a doctorate.

On average, freelancers in Germany who have used Polyspace in their recent projects have 23 years of professional experience, with a single engagement typically lasting around 2.6 years.

The most common languages among freelancers in Germany who have used Polyspace in their recent projects are German (100%), English (89%), and French (56%).

The most common industries among freelancers in Germany who have used Polyspace in their recent projects are Automotive (78%), Manufacturing (78%), and Healthcare (67%).

The most common business areas among freelancers in Germany who have used Polyspace in their recent projects are Information Technology (100%), Product Development (100%), and Quality Assurance (100%).

Main locations of FRATCH Experts, who have recently used Polyspace

Our freelancers and interim experts are at home across the DACH region — available on-site in the major business hubs or fully remote. Choose a location to discover matched specialists, local market insights and up-to-date availability.

Berlin Hamburg Munich Cologne Frankfurt Stuttgart Dusseldorf Leipzig Dortmund Essen Bremen Dresden Hanover Nuremberg

Request a free demo

Get in touch with the FRATCH team and we will get back to you within 4 hours.

Contact form

Would you rather directly get in touch?
We always have the time for a call or email!

FRATCH CEO avatar

Philipp Thomaschewski

FRATCH CEO

LinkedInFRATCH