Skip to main content
🇩🇪GDPR-compliant
Build connected data systems with

Knowledge Graph Experts in Germany

, matched with vetted and available freelancers in minutes

Hire experts who model complex domains, connect RDF and linked data sources, and deliver search, recommendation, and reasoning systems. FRATCH finds a precise match quickly from vetted, available freelancers.

Meet FRATCH Experts in Germany, who have recently used Knowledge Graph

Verified expert

Michael N.

View profile

Senior ML Engineer | AI Engineer | Problem Solver

Eichenau
Michael N.

Last position:

Senior AI Engineer | Forward Deployed Engineer at Tiefbau

  • Development of an AI-powered project organization tool for a civil engineering company that intelligently links project, task, tender, schedule, and document data through a knowledge graph.
  • Implementation of AI features for document analysis, information extraction, context-based assistance, and voice-based data capture based on Microsoft Azure AI, reducing administrative effort, making information available faster, and supporting project teams in decision-making.
  • Tech stack: Python, React, TypeScript, FastAPI, Claude Code, Codex, Graphify, PostgreSQL, Microsoft Azure AI Foundry, Azure OpenAI, Azure AI Speech, Azure AI Document Intelligence, Microsoft Graph, Microsoft Entra ID, Docker, Git, CI/CD.
Verified expert

Mirza K.

View profile

Agentic AI for a DeepResearch project

München
Mirza K.

Last position:

Agentic Automation and a RAG system

  • This project involved extraction of intelligence data to support report writing for a company that provides geopolitical, global, commercial intelligence. The data have been gathered from a number of resources (interview transcripts, online data, internal documents), and then a knowledge base has been build from it. This was the basis of a complex RAG system, that was evaluated against a golden dataset. Agents have been used to find out the contradicting intelligence, the statements supporting each other, and to store back the generated knowledge.

Used: Python, RAG, LangGraph, LangChain, deepeval, MCP

Verified expert

Fred H.

View profile

Senior Java Architect and Developer | Domain Architect (DDD, Knowledge Systems)

Munich
Fred H.

Last position:

Software Architect and Developer at Personal project

  • Recurring problem in my own AI-assisted projects: requirements analysis, use cases, and architecture decisions can be created quickly with AI support, but remain difficult to follow and scattered across Markdown files – knowledge is lost as soon as it is no longer in the context window. arknet turns requirements engineering and architecture knowledge into structured, verifiable data instead of plain text: requirements, use cases, and architecture decisions form a consistently linked knowledge graph, traceable from requirement to architecture decision – queryable by both people and AI agents. Technically based on RDF/OWL and a custom MCP server.

  • Result: Working MCP daemon, Docker image published automatically to GHCR, nine hexagonal modules, eleven ADRs (including an Open-Core licensing model). Requirements engineering and Ubiquitous Language hexagons are active. Public as a Community Edition under Apache-2.0 since 07/2026 (github.com/kogn-io/arknet), together with the Claude Code plugin and GHCR image; Open-Core model.

  • Label: Java, Maven, RDF, RDF4J, OWL, SPARQL, Model Context Protocol, Spring AI, Docker, GitHub, Git, Claude Code, Obsidian, DDD, Hexagonal Architecture, ArchUnit, JUnit, AssertJ, Interface Development, Software Architecture, Continuous Integration, Knowledge Management

Verified expert

Yannick S.

View profile

Freelance IT Consultant/Advisor

Gross-Umstadt
Yannick S.

Last position:

Freelance IT Consultant/Advisor at Deutsche Glasfaser

  • Led integration process of multiple systems between development agencies in Germany and India
  • Advised on SDKs, system integration, system architecture, API contract design, Salesforce, ServiceNow, and SAP.
Verified expert

Stephan F.

View profile

Senior Data & AI Engineer | LLM/RAG Specialist | Cloud & Graph Architect

Wiesbaden
Stephan F.

Last position:

AI & Data Engineer - Azure Enterprise AI and Knowledge Engineering at IB Schlegel - King

Designed and developed an Azure-based AI and data platform transforming distributed project documents into searchable, structured knowledge for an enterprise AI assistant. Combined incremental document processing, hybrid keyword/vector retrieval, knowledge graph extraction, and conversational AI for Microsoft Teams and Microsoft 365 Copilot. Implemented Python document-processing pipelines for PDF, Word, Outlook and text files; Azure Cosmos DB lifecycle management; Azure AI Search; Azure AI Foundry and Azure OpenAI; identity-aware retrieval with Microsoft Entra ID; project authorization; a TypeScript Microsoft Agents SDK agent; Pulumi infrastructure; resilient scheduling, retry and diagnostic tooling. Technology stack: Python, TypeScript, FastAPI, Pydantic, Azure AI Foundry, Azure OpenAI, Azure AI Search, Azure Cosmos DB, Blob/Table Storage, Container Apps/Jobs, Service Bus, Key Vault, Entra ID, Docker, Pulumi, pytest, Microsoft Teams and Microsoft 365 Copilot.

Verified expert

Laurin H.

View profile

Software Architect (Freelance)

Bochum
Laurin H.

Last position:

Software Architect (Freelance) at Care4Sure

  • Delivered MVP-focused full-stack architecture for a health-sector client: Vite/React frontend, backend services on Google Cloud Run, and Supabase for database plus IAM/authentication.
  • Supported product requirements engineering and prioritized cost-aware workload placement, implementing browser-side/edge computation where feasible before moving logic to backend services.
Verified expert

Eduard D.

View profile

Founder & CTO, vExpertAI GmbH | Agentic AI for Network & Security Operations

München
Eduard D.

Last position:

Guest Lecturer at Politehnica University Bucharest

"Reasoning Models: From LLM Foundations to NOC Automation."

Verified expert

Andreas W.

View profile

Senior Solution Architect | Enterprise Architect

Clenze
Andreas W.

Last position:

Enterprise Architect at Own development / IP of CAMCO Engineering UG

UEF 3.0 · Semantic Government Overlay (SGO) · Autonomous Systems (UAS / dual use)

  • Designed: Semantic Government Overlay (SGO) – AI-guided administration without replacing existing specialist procedures. Read-only semantic layer over registers and specialist processes based on the Federal Information Management (FIM). Decision authority remains with the case worker (architecture principle).
  • Developed: Reference architecture with source-backed, derived statements (Executable Ontologies OWL/RDF/SHACL). Technically guaranteed purpose limitation and no-write-path principle in specialist data – auditable, without a central data pool.
  • Anchored: Regulation as a design principle: EU AI Act (high-risk obligations for public-sector AI, fundamental rights impact assessment under Art. 27), GDPR, NIS2, and administrative automation limits (§ 35a VwVfG, § 31a SGB X) as technical control points in the architecture.
  • Created: Methodical tool for pilot organizations: data pipeline assessment (phase 0), compliance blueprint, and management summary as a decision-ready package for public administration.
  • Specified: UEF 3.0 as a successor architecture to TOGAF – decision paper, canonical ontology, six-layer architecture, read/actuate boundary, federation registry, terminology concordance, and release delta as a closed specification status.
  • Architected: AI-native mission OS for autonomous UAS and ground robotics as a tactical layer on top of a separately approved autopilot. Run-time assurance according to ASTM F3269-21 (Simplex pattern): the verified safety controller keeps authority, the AI function provides suggestions.
  • Designed: Three-tier architecture – Tier 0 autopilot with 650 Hz flight control on RTOS, Tier 1 AI OS with semantic world model and multi-agent cluster, Tier 2 swarm and ground mesh. Zenoh as the primary fabric, MAVLink as the only authenticated command path (single writer). Result: graceful degradation – loss of the mission, not of the aircraft.
  • Secured: Two-gate chain on the read/actuate boundary – governance gate (can-question: AI Act risk class per actuation, enforced human oversight under Art. 14, immutable log) before the RTA safety monitor (is-it-correct question: flight envelope, geofence, energy reserve) with revert to the baseline controller.
  • Anchored: Dual-use architecture with common core and build-time fork instead of runtime switch. Three separate legal levels: civil variant – UAS under the EASA Basic Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 with the limited applicability under Art. 2(2) of the AI Act, ground robotics under the Machinery Regulation 2023/1230 with the full high-risk obligation chain, Cyber Resilience Act for both; unarmed carrier variant as defense material under AWG/AWV and Dual-Use Regulation 2021/821 (BAFA approval); armed variant under KrWaffKontrG. Each variant lives under exactly one dominant legal regime. Evidence base: AI BOM, SBOM, and complete data lineage.
  • Analyzed: System analysis and realignment of grown engineering system landscapes. Approach concept for consolidation without migration – semantic layer over the existing sources instead of data transfer. Result: decision-ready implementation concept including an evaluation model for the target architecture.
Verified expert

Andreas A.

View profile

Interim AI Lead & Digital Architect · AI Operating Models in Regulated Companies · Buchautor

Munich
Andreas A.

Last position:

AI Consultant & Digital Architect at TeamIntel

  • Governed multi-agent orchestration for regulated, EU-based companies – self-hostable, compliant with the EU AI Act and GDPR („by design“), BYOM (own models/GPU).
  • Two-gate governance: agent deliberation + mandatory human approval, complete signed audit trail; graduated autonomy model („internal → autonomous per skill“).
  • Verified knowledge graph („Company Brain“) with source evidence for each answer; proprietary orchestration framework (Virtual Team Framework).
  • Industry solutions for financial services: compliance monitoring, invoice and contract review; hands-on development with LLMs (including Anthropic/Claude), agentic workflows, RAG.
  • Development of the governance-focused multi-agent platform TeamIntel (see AI reference projects).
Verified expert

Omar A.

View profile

Engineering Leader · AI & Full-Stack Systems · Ex-Founder & CEO

Munich
Omar A.

Last position:

Senior Fullstack AI Engineer (Team Lead – B2C Platform) at mama health

  • Partner directly with C-level leadership (CEO, CAIO, CTO) on architecture, OKR strategy, and cross-team roadmap prioritization, translating strategic goals into structured engineering requirements.
  • Surfaced and mapped technical debt across the entire organization with C-level leadership and co-defined a prioritized remediation strategy, balancing debt paydown against feature delivery.
  • Led code reviews and technical standards across the team, fostering a mentor-first environment with two-way feedback dialogue — pairing on complex pipeline work and unblocking junior engineers on async architecture patterns.
  • Re-architected the AI companion's core processing pipeline from synchronous to asynchronous with a queue-based worker architecture, enabling horizontal scalability and cutting upload processing time ~4x (from ~22s to 5–10s) while improving response accuracy.
  • Designed an AI-driven document intelligence workflow with automatic multi-document classification, per-document summarization, and relevance guardrails for the patient care journey.
  • Built a unified patient memory system (short- and long-term context) bridging the document vault and chatbot into a single bidirectional, context-aware platform.
Verified expert

Niko K.

View profile

AI Engineer & Data Scientist

Karlsdorf-Neuthard
Niko K.

Last position:

Co-Founder & AI Engineer at KAIKI GmbH

End-to-end responsibility for all products – conception, architecture, development, and production operations as the sole developer; also customer discussions, proposals, and marketing.

Underwriting Copilot – AI assistant for industrial insurance (in production with a customer)

  • Supports underwriters in analyzing industrial insurance submissions – in production at an industrial insurer.
  • Framework-independent RAG architecture with Hybrid Search (BM25 + pgvector) across large, heterogeneous document collections.
  • Two-stage evaluation and observability pipeline (code assertions + LLM-as-Judge) that makes answer quality, retrieval accuracy, and citation integrity measurable in a regression-safe way.

Kaiki Menu Analyzer – Data intelligence platform (in production with a customer)

  • Automatically collects and analyzes food data from around 25,000 German restaurants.
  • Scalable 7-container architecture (FastAPI, partitioned PostgreSQL, Redis/RQ) with LLM-supported extraction of structured data from PDF, HTML, and images.
  • Complete CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions), production cloud deployment, interactive dashboards (Dash).

Kaiki GEO Atlas – GEO platform (in production with a customer)

  • Measures brand visibility across five AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, Claude), each augmented with web search, orchestrated as a DAG workflow pipeline (Dispatcher → Sub-Workflows → Scoring → Report) with fail isolation.
  • 6-container deployment (FastAPI, Celery, Redis, PostgreSQL); LLM cost estimation, PDF audit report, rule-based cross-signal insights (no additional LLM effort).

Data Pipeline & Analytics Platform – Competitive analysis in the automotive aftermarket

  • Automated data pipeline with gap analysis algorithms and role-based access control; 230+ tests.
  • Backend with FastAPI, PostgreSQL, SQLAlchemy.

Product development (actively in development)

BankingGPT – AI assistant for complaint management in cooperative banking

  • Security architecture at its core: no AI draft reaches the customer without human approval – the approval decision is stored in auditable code, not in the language model (monotonic: the model may increase the level, but never lower it).
  • Genuine agentic components, each with its own boundaries: the model selects tools itself through an MCP server (read-only, allowlisted, capped, fail-safe); sensitive cases are sent via the open A2A protocol (JSON-RPC, Agent Card, message/send/tasks/get; client implemented independently) to a standalone specialist agent (securities/law), which never lowers the review requirement (pinned by tests).
  • Evaluation-driven across ten analysis rounds; an independent review and blind tests uncovered a security defect that nine automated runs had missed.
  • Voice AI frontend, responding live: covered cases are answered during the conversation, while sensitive cases are escalated before generation; measured response latency < 7 s (local GPU STT/TTS).

Stack & production readiness: Python, pydantic-ai, FastAPI/Celery, PostgreSQL/pgvector, FastMCP, fasta2a, Docker; multi-tenant (physical vector isolation per tenant), encrypted PII, OWASP-LLM-reviewed, 275 tests, CI/CD; provider-portable (Ollama / EU-Cloud-Vertex).

After-Sales Assistant – agentic RAG/GraphRAG assistant based on public OEM manuals (automotive after-sales)

  • Genuinely agentic with LangGraph: ReAct agent with four tools and conversation memory – the model decides itself whether to use the manual (RAG, Chroma), a knowledge graph (GraphRAG, Neo4j/Cypher – decoding warning lights), or a workshop/booking service.
  • Human-in-the-loop before the irreversible action: before every appointment booking, the graph pauses (interrupt) and obtains the driver's explicit confirmation – the same approval-before-action discipline as in BankingGPT, in a different framework.
  • Eval as a CI gate: three-part scorecard (RAGAS grounding + deterministic tool-routing accuracy + DeepEval safety: does the answer mention the warning first in the case of a critical warning?) blocks the pipeline; provider-agnostic (OpenAI/Azure/Anthropic), FastAPI with token streaming.

Stack: Python, LangChain/LangGraph, Chroma, Neo4j, RAGAS/DeepEval, FastAPI, Docker.

Verified expert

Alexander S.

View profile

AI Consultant for AI Voice Bot Systems

Herzogenrath
Alexander S.

Last position:

AI Consultant for AI Voice Bot System at Rudolf Hörmann GmbH & Co.KG

  • Consultant for system architecture, AI agents & integration, coach for data & process logic, Graph-RAG approaches, security and data protection.
  • On-premise AI solutions with high compliance and performance requirements.
  • Architecture decisions, operational setup, strategic prioritization & deployment.
  • Technologies: LiveKit JS SDK, LiveKit Agents, Web Audio API, JS, AudioWorklet, Loki, vLLM, Zscaler, Docker, Neo4j, MySQL, Python.
  • Models: GPT-OSS 20B, Whisper large v3 turbo, Qwen3-TTS.
Verified expert

Mathew D.

View profile

Data Science Expert and AI Strategist

Schlangenbad
Mathew D.

Last position:

Data Science Expert and AI Strategist at Freelancer

  • Built an API to ingest, clean, translate, and index EU tenders documents in Neo4j, enabling hybrid search with RAG and Cypher queries via a Streamlit dashboard
  • Deployed the API on AWS Lightsail container services with CI/CD automation via GitHub Actions, ensuring stability through pytest unit and integration tests
  • Designed and developed a comprehensive online course on data analysis using ChatGPT for professionals and learners, creating instructional videos and interactive Jupyter notebooks
  • Utilized OBS and professional audio equipment to ensure high-quality video and audio content
  • Led a CRM data normalization and cleaning project visualized via a Sankey diagram to aid customer understanding and pipeline development
  • Implemented and validated a genAI-driven web crawling strategy on AWS, ensuring data quality, scalability, and CRM data augmentation
Verified expert

Jeanne Y.

View profile

Process Engineering Intern

Cologne
Jeanne Y.

Last position:

Process Engineering Intern at Procter & Gamble

  • Independently initiated and deployed automated validation workflows using Python, cutting manual processing by 58% and improving efficiency
  • Developed a machine learning model for synthetic defect generation, reducing downtime and production costs; deployed locally and via Databricks and Azure AI Factory
  • Utilized a small dataset of image data from the production lines and extended this dataset with training on models like cycleGAN and pix2pix
  • Built and optimized the Linux-based development environment for training 3D models; maintained reproducibility via GitHub
  • Presented technical insights to cross-functional teams (engineers, QA, project managers), ensuring alignment of ML solutions with operational needs

Discover over 15,000 top freelancers

Statistics of experts using Knowledge Graph

Aggregated from the professional profiles of matched freelancers.

Experience

16 years

Knowledge Graph experts in Germany have 16 years of professional experience on average.

Position duration

1.9 years

Knowledge Graph experts in Germany stay in a single position for 1.9 years on average.

Positions per freelancer

11

Knowledge Graph experts in Germany have completed 11 positions on average over the course of their careers.

Top business areas

Information Technology, Product Development, Research and Development

Knowledge Graph experts in Germany have gathered most of their hands-on project experience in Information Technology, Product Development, and Research and Development.

Top industries

Information Technology, Professional Services, Automotive

Knowledge Graph experts in Germany are most in demand in Information Technology, Professional Services, and Automotive.

Certification focus areas

Information Technology, Business Intelligence, Product Development

Knowledge Graph experts in Germany earn their certifications most often in Information Technology, Business Intelligence, and Product Development.

Bachelor's degree or higher

93%

93% of Knowledge Graph experts in Germany hold at least a Bachelor's degree.

Master's degree or higher

81%

81% of Knowledge Graph experts in Germany hold at least a Master's degree.

Doctorate

26%

26% of Knowledge Graph experts in Germany have a doctorate (PhD).

Certifications per freelancer

2

Knowledge Graph experts in Germany hold 2 professional certifications on average.

Most common languages

English, German, French

Knowledge Graph experts in Germany most often speak English, German, and French.

Speak two or more languages

100%

100% of Knowledge Graph experts in Germany speak two or more languages.

Based on our profile pool as of 29 Oct 2026.

Daily rate distribution

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
3% of Knowledge Graph experts in Germany charge less than €400 per day.
44% of Knowledge Graph experts in Germany charge between €400 and €800 per day.
46% of Knowledge Graph experts in Germany charge between €800 and €1200 per day.
8% of Knowledge Graph experts in Germany charge €1200 or more per day.
<€400 €400-​800 €800-​1200 €1200+

The chart shows how the daily rates of experts in this technology in Germany are distributed, based on recent contracts on our platform. Each bar covers a rate range — its height shows the share of experts charging within that range.

Average rates of experts in Germany using Knowledge Graph

Rates are based on recent contracts and do not include FRATCH margin.

1000
750
500
250
Rate comparison chart
Daily rate avg. 782 €

The average daily rate is the mean of all daily rates from recent contracts of comparable freelancers on our platform.

1000
750
500
250
Rate comparison chart
Median rate 800 €

The median daily rate is the middle value of all daily rates — half of comparable freelancers charge less, half charge more. Unlike the average, it is barely affected by outliers.

Calculated based on our freelancers’ daily rates as of 29 Oct 2026. Actual rates may vary depending on seniority level, experience, skill specialization, project complexity, and engagement length.

Knowledge Graph experts industry focus

See which industries our matched freelancers work in most often — every figure is calculated live from the freelancers on FRATCH.

  • Information Technology (95%)
  • Professional Services (64%)
  • Automotive (48%)
  • Education (41%)
  • Banking and Finance (39%)
  • Manufacturing (36%)
  • Retail (36%)
  • Media and Entertainment (32%)

Please note that freelancers can work across multiple industries, so percentages overlap.

About the technology

What a Knowledge Graph Does

A knowledge graph represents entities, relationships, and facts in a connected structure that machines can query and interpret. It links people, products, documents, locations, and events through shared meaning rather than isolated database records. This supports context-aware search, discovery, analytics, and automated reasoning.

Core Building Blocks

Projects commonly use RDF graphs, ontologies, taxonomies, and entity resolution to create a reliable semantic layer. SPARQL is used to query graph data, while JSON-LD and schema vocabularies help expose meaning across web services. Graph databases such as Neo4j may complement RDF stores, depending on the data model and query needs.

Typical Applications

Knowledge graphs appear wherever information is distributed across systems and relationships matter.

  • Improve enterprise search with entities, synonyms, and context
  • Connect customer, product, supplier, and document data
  • Power recommendations, question answering, and content discovery
  • Support data catalogs, master data, and regulatory traceability
  • Enrich machine learning features with structured relationships

When Companies Need Specialists

Companies bring in freelance expertise when a graph initiative must move from a proof of concept to a maintainable data product. Common triggers include fragmented master data, weak search relevance, a new data platform, or an ontology that needs governance. In Germany, specialists often support manufacturing, insurance, healthcare, automotive, and research teams across remote and on-site settings.

Skills That Matter

Strong professionals combine information modeling with practical data engineering. They can define classes and properties, map source systems, resolve duplicate entities, and establish validation rules. Useful adjacent skills include SQL, Python, APIs, cloud data platforms, NLP, data governance, and experience with RDF, OWL, SHACL, SPARQL, Neo4j, or Amazon Neptune.

Quality Signals

Look for a clear modeling approach tied to business questions, not a graph created only to showcase technology. A capable specialist explains trade-offs between an RDF graph and a property graph, documents ontology decisions, and tests query performance with realistic data. They also plan provenance, access control, versioning, and ownership so the graph remains useful after delivery. German projects may additionally require clear communication in German or English, depending on stakeholders.

Published on:
FRATCH GPT

FRATCH GPT delivers freelancer proposals with clear reasoning and transparent pricing in minutes, helping your hiring department quickly and compliantly find the best talent.

Give it a try:

Try FRATCH GPT

Frequently asked questions

Before you brief your next project: the most common questions about Knowledge Graph.

A Knowledge Graph connects entities and facts so applications can use context and relationships, not just keyword matches. Companies use it for enterprise search, recommendations, data integration, question answering, and knowledge management.

A Knowledge Graph focuses on relationships and shared meaning, while a traditional relational database organizes records into predefined tables. It is useful when data comes from many sources or when queries must follow changing connections between entities.

An RDF graph is well suited to interoperable data, formal ontologies, linked data, and standards such as SPARQL and OWL. A property graph, often implemented with Neo4j, can be a practical choice for application-focused traversal and flexible relationship properties. The right option depends on governance, interoperability, query patterns, and existing systems.

A Knowledge Graph specialist should often understand data modeling, entity resolution, APIs, SQL, Python, and data quality. Experience with RDF, JSON-LD, SHACL, NLP, cloud services, or graph databases can be important for a complete delivery.

A Knowledge Graph project needs practical experience with the specific scope, sources, and delivery stage rather than a fixed tenure threshold. A proof of concept may need strong modeling and query skills, while an enterprise rollout also requires governance, security, performance, and change management.

A Knowledge Graph engagement can usually be delivered remotely when source owners, domain experts, and technical teams have reliable collaboration routines. On-site workshops can still help with ontology design and stakeholder alignment, especially in German organizations with many business units.

A Knowledge Graph specialist should explain modeling choices through concrete business queries and show how provenance, validation, and duplicate handling are managed. Ask for examples of source integration, ontology governance, query testing, and documentation rather than judging the work by graph size alone.

A Knowledge Graph assignment often combines ambiguous business language with imperfect source data, so discovery and stakeholder communication matter as much as implementation. Specialists should be ready to define scope, negotiate ontology boundaries, document assumptions, and connect the graph to search, analytics, or operational applications.

The average hourly rate of freelancers in Germany who have used Knowledge Graph in their recent projects is 98 €, which corresponds to a daily rate of about 782 € based on an 8-hour working day.

Of the freelancers in Germany who have used Knowledge Graph in their recent projects, 93% hold at least a Bachelor's degree, 81% hold at least a Master's degree, and 26% hold a doctorate.

On average, freelancers in Germany who have used Knowledge Graph in their recent projects have 16 years of professional experience, with a single engagement typically lasting around 1.9 years.

The most common languages among freelancers in Germany who have used Knowledge Graph in their recent projects are English (100%), German (98%), and French (20%).

The most common industries among freelancers in Germany who have used Knowledge Graph in their recent projects are Information Technology (95%), Professional Services (64%), and Automotive (48%).

The most common business areas among freelancers in Germany who have used Knowledge Graph in their recent projects are Information Technology (100%), Product Development (89%), and Research and Development (84%).

Main locations of FRATCH Experts, who have recently used Knowledge Graph

Our freelancers and interim experts are at home across the DACH region — available on-site in the major business hubs or fully remote. Choose a location to discover matched specialists, local market insights and up-to-date availability.

Berlin Hamburg Munich Cologne Frankfurt Stuttgart Dusseldorf Leipzig Dortmund Essen Bremen Dresden Hanover Nuremberg

Request a free demo

Get in touch with the FRATCH team and we will get back to you within 4 hours.

Contact form

Would you rather directly get in touch?
We always have the time for a call or email!

FRATCH CEO avatar

Philipp Thomaschewski

FRATCH CEO

LinkedInFRATCH