Grafana Experts in Munich
in minutes from over 15,000 CVs with the power of AIHire experts who design Grafana dashboards, connect Prometheus and Loki, and turn metrics, logs, and alerts into clear operations views. Get fast, precise matching with vetted, available freelancers.
Meet FRATCH Experts in Munich, who have recently used Grafana
Karen Manukyan
Last position:
Personal AI Engineering Project — Croky AI at Crocky AI
Product:
- Built a production-ready AI platform for generating brand-aware marketing images and videos from product data, user requirements, and uploaded media.
- Own the platform architecture, technical roadmap, API design, security, deployment workflow, operational reliability, and model-provider strategy.
- Developed the core platform in .NET and built supporting AI and workflow prototypes in Python, applying language-independent API contracts and structured interfaces between services and model providers.
- Implemented reliable background processing with RabbitMQ, persisted workflow state, idempotent handling, retries, failure recovery, logging, secure storage, authorization, and credit accounting.
- Made pragmatic build-versus-buy and model-routing decisions based on reliability, latency, cost, and maintainability rather than novelty.
Agent Orchestration & RAG Systems
- Built and compared agent workflows using Microsoft Agent Framework, LangGraph, and LangChain, including tool use, conditional routing, clarification steps, state management, and hand-offs between agents.
- Implemented reusable .NET components for agents, prompts, tools, model providers, structured responses, and retrieval with pyvector, making it easier to change AI providers without rewriting the core workflow.
Michael Nelz
Last position:
Senior ML Engineer, AI Engineer at Lanxess AG
- Deployment and scaling of existing ML initiatives, including demand and cash flow forecasts.
- Building robust monitoring with mlflow for data stability, model performance, and drift detection, as well as implementing additional ML use cases.
- Further development of an Agentic AI chatbot for transparent and easy-to-understand model explanations.
Vicenco Kenk
Last position:
ITSM Project Manager (self-employed)
Unified ITSM framework
- Definition of a company-wide ITSM target picture
- Introduction of a uniform service structure across all business units
SLA and OLA management
- Building a standardized SLA framework
- Definition of service classes (Business Critical, Standard, Low Priority)
- Introduction of OLAs between internal teams
- Building meaningful SLA reporting
- Definition of KPI and service dashboards for business units
Service portfolio management
- Definition of service descriptions
- If needed, preparing possible cost and service billing
Ticketing & processes
- Incident management
- Uniform ticket categories
- Standardized prioritization
- Escalation matrix
- Automations
- Self-service optimization
Request fulfillment
- Service catalog across all business units
- Approval workflows
Problem management
- Introduction of root cause analysis
- Known error database
- Problem review process
Complete asset management concept
- Hardware lifecycle management
- Software lifecycle management
- Leasing lifecycle
- Mobile device lifecycle
- Monitor lifecycle
- Phone lifecycle
Processes
- Procurement
- Goods receipt
- Inventory
- Assignment
- Return
- Disposal
- Leasing return Goal: single source of truth for all assets
CMDB design
- Definition of all configuration items:
- Workplace
- Notebooks
- Monitors
- Mobile phones
- Printers
Infrastructure
- Servers
- Firewalls
- Switches
- WLAN
- Storage
- Backup systems
Cloud
- Azure resources
- Microsoft 365
- SaaS services
Relationships
- User ↔ Asset
- Asset ↔ Service
- Service ↔ Infrastructure
- Location ↔ Asset
- Goal: make all service dependencies visible
Software asset & license management
- License management concept
- License balancing
- Compliance reporting
- Microsoft license management
- Adobe license management
- SaaS management
- Contract management
- Renewal management
Interfaces & automation Existing systems
- Workday
- Joiner
- Mover
- Leaver
TESMA
- Leasing data
- Contract data
Matrix42
- Asset synchronization
- User synchronization
Active Directory / Entra ID
- User management
Microsoft 365
- License assignment
- Group management
Dormakaba
Access processes
Lifecycle services
Monitoring platforms
- PRTG
- Palo Alto
- Cisco
Reporting & KPI framework
- Definition of a management dashboard
- KPIs
- Ticket volume
- SLA fulfillment
- MTTR
- First resolution rate
- Asset accuracy
- License compliance
- Change success rate
- Service availability
- Degree of automation
Network redesign support
- Governance
- Support of the network redesign from an ITSM point of view
- Definition of affected services
- Change management structure
- Communication concept
CMDB integration
- Recording of all network components
- Service mapping
- Dependency analysis
Validation of documentation and knowledge base articles
- Network documentation
- Operations documentation
- Standard changes
Monitoring & event management
- Target picture
- Central monitoring concept
- Event management process
- Alerting strategy
- Escalation model
Systems
Cisco
Palo Alto
Fortinet
Rubrik
Veeam
Matrix42
Azure
Microsoft 365 Automation
Ticket creation from monitoring
Escalations
Standard actions
Audit, compliance & information security
- ISO 27001 consulting
- TISAX consulting
- NIS2 preparation - consulting
- Audit-ready processes
- Documentation structure
- Evidence tracking in Matrix42
Roadmap
- 12-month roadmap
- Prioritization of all measures
- Quick wins
- Medium-term projects
- Long-term target picture
- Documentation
Marco Toscano
Last position:
Scrum Master at Siemens Energy
- Responsible for introducing agile methods within the Interface & Integration Team (2 Scrum Teams)
- Planning and delivering trainings in agile methods
- Facilitating workshops and Scrum events
- Removing impediments
- Increasing sprint performance
Ljubomir Obrenovic
Last position:
Senior Software Test Engineer at Keil KTM GmbH
Temporary employment
- System black-box integration tests (BBIT, IVVQ): Execution of regression, release, acceptance, and compliance tests for safety-critical brake control units in the rail industry
- Software test application & integration: Runtime configuration of software components and libraries, validation of interfaces, configuration dependencies, and component interactions
- Test automation (FEAT framework): Co-development and further development of an automated test framework for test execution, reporting, and result analysis
- Functional safety (SiL4, FuSi): Ensuring compliance with safety requirements, traceability and coverage, as well as standards compliance according to EN50126/28/29
- Test automation for communication components: Configuration and validation of fieldbus (CAN) and Ethernet-based TCMS data communication interfaces (TRDP and CIP)
- Requirements analysis & shift-left (PTC Windchill ALM): Analysis of software and system artifacts to identify gaps, ambiguities, and redundancies early in the SDLC
- Test design & test case development: Derivation of test conditions, coverage strategies, and implementation of data-driven test cases (DDT), including reusable test data fixtures
- CI/CD & automation (Python, PowerShell, Jenkins, SVN): Automation of build, test, and HIL deployment processes as well as integration into CI/CD pipelines
- Test data & configuration management (XML): Maintenance and adaptation of XML test vectors and system configurations with automated integration into test environments
- Non-functional testing: Execution of performance and load tests to assess stability and system behavior
- Agile development & defect management (JIRA, Confluence): Participation in Scrum teams, test coordination, review of test artifacts, as well as defect tracking and root-cause analysis
- Error analysis & debugging (CANoe, CANalyzer): Analysis of errors and message flows across multiple system layers (application to bus)
- Model-based analysis (UML, Enterprise Architect): Specification of SUT/SOW and support for systematic test control
- Process & test documentation: Creation of integration and test documentation according to internal quality and certification requirements
Tamás Eppel
Last position:
Senior Software Developer / Tech Lead at NDA (defense / OSINT)
- Designing the audit logging framework
- Implementing APIs for developers to integrate in their codebase
- Implementing ingestion pipeline, database query layer and UI for browsing the audit events
- Improving stability and reliability of the backend system
Mirza Klimenta
Last position:
Agentic AI for a DeepResearch project at Freelance
- Created a multi-agentic system supported by a knowledge graph to automate drafting of research papers
- Used multiple experts (OpenAI models) collaborating during document drafting
- Extracted useful information from the knowledge graph
- Technologies: LangChain, LangGraph, Smolagents, LlamaIndex, dspy
- Infrastructure: Terraform and GitHub Actions (CI/CD) on AWS
- Deployed initial application as a Streamlit app
Thomas Hoefkens
Last position:
Senior MLOps, DevOps Engineer at Trianel Energy
- Build and operate an end-to-end MLOps platform on Azure ML and Kubernetes (Kubeflow) for the automated deployment, monitoring, and scaling of forecasting models (including Temporal Fusion Transformer, Informer, Autoformer).
- Implement CI/CD pipelines in Azure DevOps for the full ML lifecycle – from resource provisioning (Terraform), data transformation (Hugging Face Datasets, Pandas, PyTorch, CUDA cluster) through training and evaluation to model registry and endpoint deployment.
- Integrate MLflow for experiment tracking, model versioning, performance monitoring, and automated registration in the Azure Model Registry.
- Develop and containerize PyTorch training jobs (Azure Notebook, Jupyter Notebooks) for price and time series forecasting (PFC models) with automatic rollout via Azure ML Endpoints and REST/gRPC interfaces, Docker containerization, secured with OAuth 2.0.
- Set up monitoring and alerting mechanisms (Prometheus, MLflow Metrics), log centralization, and cost monitoring.
- Automate infrastructure provisioning and model deployment using Terraform, Helm, and Azure CLI; connect to existing market data systems and event pipelines.
- Migrate existing workloads and databases (IONOS → Azure, MongoDB) with integration into central MLOps workflows and internal networks.
- Extend the platform with LLM-based tools (LangChain, LangServe) to integrate GPT-based analysis modules into existing Spring Boot services for market anomaly detection and automated reports.
- Analyze and architect a software solution to process large volumes of data efficiently (>3000 messages/sec.) (market data store).
- Spring Boot / Java 21 container development with RabbitMQ for distributing stock market data via MongoDB (Kubernetes) with fast storage of data in Redis RMaps, deduplication, forwarding messages to Read Model queues, and building Read Models for UI display in MongoDB.
- Integration of RESTHeart to create a REST API for MongoDB.
- Build an Angular frontend to simplify data queries and master data maintenance.
- Agentic coding with remote and local LLMs (Claude Sonnet, Ollama Qwen) and MCP servers.
- Develop Python scripts for transforming and cleaning incoming stock market data (Pandas, scikit-learn).
Damian Åšniatecki
Last position:
CTO at FRATCH.IO
- Managed end-to-end product development, overseeing the successful delivery of technical solutions.
- Led and mentored a team of highly specialised technical professionals, fostering a culture of collaboration and innovation.
- Oversaw the hiring process to build a talented and dedicated team.
- Built a scalable and robust backend microservices system from scratch, designing and extending it to meet evolving business needs.
- Ensured the system's high availability with a 99.99% up time, implementing resilient architecture and monitoring mechanisms.
- Developed and implemented technical strategies, aligning them with business goals and objectives.
Ronald Mazelisz
Last position:
DevOps Consultant at M.it services & systems GmbH
- Adjusting, optimizing, configuring, and administering a multi-stage GitLab instance with over 250 users
- Building, adjusting, expanding, and optimizing infrastructure, configuration, and monitoring
- Providing services and handing them over to production
- System environment: DependencyTrack, GitLab, Grafana, Hedgedoc, Kubernetes, OAuth2 Proxy, Openstack, Prometheus, Syseleven
Sebastian Kanzow
Last position:
Senior Lead Developer, System Architecture at AVL DITEST
- Redesign of a legacy Windows app for vehicle diagnostics as an AWS cloud application
- Creating build pipelines and conducting code reviews using Kotlin, Spring Boot, Micronaut, Jenkins, and GitHub
Serge Kalinin
Last position:
MLOps (machine learning operations) at REWE Digital GmbH
- It is like a startup within REWE, where we have to build a new forecasting system on Google Cloud Platform from the scratch. Although, officially my role is called MLOps, my actual tasks also include development of data processing pipelines (data engineering) and data scientists tasks such as feature engineering and model trainings.
- GCP: Terraform (tofu), Vertex AI (Kubeflow), Cloud Run, IAM, Google Cloud Storage, BigQuery, Artifact Registry
- Data engineering: Snowflake as the main data warehouse, Terraform, DBT for data model implementations
- CI/CD: GitLab. We have built a CI/CD pipeline that automates deployments of new releases up to production environment
Stefan Wimmer
Last position:
Architect/Software Developer at Global Logistics Support GmbH
Task
- Further development of a new ERP system with Blazor
- Creation of e-invoices in the XRechnung and ZUGFeRD formats
- UI/UX design Client-server system
- Windows 11 Technology
- Microsoft .NET 9, Git, Azure DevOps, ASP.NET, MSSQL, Blazor Programming languages
- C#, MVVM Development tools
- Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2022 Database
- MSSQL Industry
- Other
Vitaliy Ryumshyn
Last position:
DevOps GitOps (temp) at Signal Iduna
- Responsible for Openshift/Kubernetes on-prem administration and developer support.
- Developed URP infrastructure automation with Python, Ansible, Kustomize and ArgoCD, Argo Workflow/Events stack.
- Wrote smoke and load tests for URP infrastructure utilizing Python, Kustomize and ApplicationSets.
- Helped to set up and deploy URP infrastructure in Google Cloud, GKE.
- Set up monitoring for URP and ArgoCD stack with Splunk Cloud.
- Performed system administration tasks across RedHat Linux, Kubernetes/Openshift, ArgoCD, GitLab, Bitbucket Enterprise, Kafka and MongoDB.
Tobias Nawa
Last position:
Enterprise & Solutions Architect
- Building an independent enterprise IT setup — cloud strategy, network, AWS landing zone, security requirements, contract negotiations.
- Migration of all applications; avoiding high contractual penalties for the client.
- Onboarding and coordination o...
Discover over 15,000 top freelancers
Statistics of experts using Grafana
Aggregated from the professional profiles of matched freelancers.
Experience
20 years (Germany: 18 years)
Position duration
2.1 years (Germany: 2 years)
Positions per freelancer
12
Top business areas
Information Technology, Product Development, Operations
Top industries
Information Technology, Automotive, Banking and Finance
Certification focus areas
Information Technology, Product Development, Project Management
Bachelor's degree or higher
92% (Germany: 90%)
Master's degree or higher
74% (Germany: 54%)
Doctorate
18% (Germany: 8%)
Certifications per freelancer
4 (Germany: 3)
Most common languages
German, English, Spanish
Speak two or more languages
100% (Germany: 98%)
Based on our profile pool as of 30 Aug 2026.
Daily rate distribution
The chart shows how the daily rates of freelancers in this technology in Munich are distributed, based on recent contracts on our platform. Each bar covers a rate range — its height shows how many freelancers charge within that range.
Average rates of experts in Munich using Grafana
Rates are based on recent contracts and do not include FRATCH margin.
The average daily rate is the mean of all daily rates from recent contracts of comparable freelancers on our platform.
The median daily rate is the middle value of all daily rates — half of comparable freelancers charge less, half charge more. Unlike the average, it is barely affected by outliers.
Calculated based on our freelancers’ daily rates as of 30 Aug 2026. Actual rates may vary depending on seniority level, experience, skill specialization, project complexity, and engagement length.
About the technology
Dashboards
Grafana turns technical data into dashboards people can read fast. It is used to track infrastructure, application health, business KPIs, and incident response in one place. Strong specialists focus on clear visual paths, useful defaults, and panels that answer real operational questions.
Alerts
Grafana is often chosen to support alerting that fits how teams work day to day. The goal is not noise, but signals that point to a real service issue or threshold breach.
- Alert rules and routing
- Notification channels
- Runbook links and escalation cues
- Silence and maintenance handling
Stack
In practice, Grafana sits on top of tools like Prometheus, Loki, Tempo, InfluxDB, Elasticsearch, and cloud monitoring sources. A strong specialist knows how data is shaped before it reaches a panel, and how query design affects what the team can trust.
When to hire
Companies usually bring in freelance Grafana expertise when dashboards become hard to maintain, alerts are too noisy, or teams need a clean observability setup for a release, migration, or incident review. In Munich, this often comes up in product teams, industrial software, fintech, and cloud operations where English working knowledge is common, but local coordination can still matter.
What good work looks like
A good Grafana professional builds for the people who use the views, not just for the data source. They keep naming consistent, reduce clutter, set sensible time ranges, and make panels easy to extend.
- Clear dashboard structure
- Practical query design
- Reusable variables and templates
- Secure access and permissions
Delivery topics
Grafana work often covers new dashboard rollouts, alert tuning, folder and permission models, shared views for teams, and cleanup of legacy panels. For remote or on-site work, the best specialists can explain trade-offs simply and leave behind setups that teams can own without constant support.
Frequently asked questions
Need clarity? These are the questions we hear most often about Grafana.
Grafana is used to turn metrics, logs, traces, and alert data into dashboards teams can act on. Companies use it to watch service health, spot incidents early, and give operations, product, and leadership a shared view of what is happening. It works best when the data sources and panel design are planned together.
Grafana is strongest when you want one flexible layer across many data sources, especially in observability setups built around Prometheus, Loki, or Tempo. Kibana is often tied more closely to the Elastic stack, while Datadog is a managed service with a broader built-in feature set. The right choice depends on whether you want open integration, hosted convenience, or deeper Elastic-native search.
A strong Grafana specialist usually understands PromQL, LogQL, basic SQL, and how monitoring data is collected and labeled. Knowledge of Prometheus, Loki, Tempo, alert routing, and access control is also useful. The best experts can talk with platform, application, and security teams without losing the thread.
A small Grafana setup can be handled quickly if the data sources are clean and the goal is simple reporting. Bigger work needs someone who has built dashboards for production operations, tuned alerts, and handled permission models. If the project touches many teams or critical systems, experience with observability design matters more than just visual styling.
Yes, Grafana work is often a good fit for remote delivery because dashboards, alert rules, and data sources can be reviewed in shared sessions. In Munich, some teams prefer a mix of remote work and on-site workshops when they need alignment with operations or leadership. What matters most is clear access to the systems and fast feedback from the people who use the dashboards.
Look for a Grafana specialist who asks about the users of each dashboard, the source data, and the decisions the view should support. Good work is easy to navigate, uses consistent naming, avoids duplicate panels, and keeps alert noise low. Ask to see examples of alert design, templating, and permission handling, not just screenshots.
No, Grafana is used for much more than infrastructure. Teams also use it for application performance, business metrics, manufacturing signals, service-level views, and incident analysis. The best results come when the dashboard matches a clear question, not when it tries to show everything at once.
Before you bring in a Grafana expert, gather the data sources, the key users, and the questions the dashboards must answer. It helps to know which alerts are useful today, which panels are outdated, and who needs edit access. A clear starting point makes the work faster and keeps the setup focused.
The average hourly rate of freelancers in Munich, Germany who have used Grafana in their recent projects is 100 €, which corresponds to a daily rate of about 804 € based on an 8-hour working day.
Of the freelancers in Munich, Germany who have used Grafana in their recent projects, 92% hold at least a Bachelor's degree, 74% hold at least a Master's degree, and 18% hold a doctorate.
On average, freelancers in Munich, Germany who have used Grafana in their recent projects have 20 years of professional experience, with a single engagement typically lasting around 2.1 years.
The most common languages among freelancers in Munich, Germany who have used Grafana in their recent projects are German (98%), English (98%), and Spanish (14%).
The most common industries among freelancers in Munich, Germany who have used Grafana in their recent projects are Information Technology (98%), Automotive (53%), and Banking and Finance (53%).
The most common business areas among freelancers in Munich, Germany who have used Grafana in their recent projects are Information Technology (98%), Product Development (91%), and Operations (51%).
Main locations of FRATCH Experts, who have recently used Grafana
Our freelancers and interim experts are at home across the DACH region — available on-site in the major business hubs or fully remote. Choose a location to discover matched specialists, local market insights and up-to-date availability.
Request a free demo
Get in touch with the FRATCH team and we will get back to you within 4 hours.
Would you rather directly get in touch?
We always have the time for a call or email!

Berlin
Hamburg
Cologne
Frankfurt
Stuttgart
Dusseldorf
Nuremberg