NIST 800-53 Experts in Germany
, matched in minutes from over 15,000 CVs with the power of AIHire experts who design control baselines, prepare assessment evidence and align security programs with NIST SP 800-53. FRATCH connects you with vetted, available freelancers through fast, precise AI matching.
Meet FRATCH Experts in Germany, who have recently used NIST 800-53
Rallis T.
Last position:
Freelancer Senior Program Manager at LTM Mindtree-Germany
- Managed Microsoft Cloud Accelerator Factory (CAF) programs for global enterprise customers, ensuring Azure cloud implementations aligned with security, governance, and compliance best practices, including ISO 27001-aligned controls and cloud security frameworks.
- Managed complex global enterprise transformation programs with strong focus on project delivery, financial governance, budget control, planning, risk management, and executive reporting, ensuring delivery within scope, timeline, and budget.
- Led the implementation of e-invoicing solutions for Nestlé, coordinating finance, IT, business stakeholders, and external providers to ensure successful integration, testing, rollout, and delivery of electronic invoicing processes.
- Managed an Oracle-to-PostgreSQL database migration, coordinating technical teams, application owners, testing activities, dependencies, risks, and cutover planning to ensure a controlled and successful transition.
- Led cross-functional programs involving finance and payment-related processes, enterprise platforms, and system integrations, with strong stakeholder management across business, IT, vendors, and senior leadership.
- Delivered transformation programs in FMCG environments, including Nestlé, managing complex international stakeholder structures, third-party providers, governance, RAID management, and business-critical dependencies.
Daniel J.
Last position:
Information Security Consultant
NIS2 Implementation Project and ISMS Development Based on IT-Grundschutz
Municipal utilities, public-law institution
- Analysis of the current compliance status regarding the requirements of the NIS Directive (NIS-2, EU 2022/2555).
- Identification of critical infrastructures and processes within the organization.
- Development of an action plan to meet NIS requirements.
- Conducting a risk analysis in accordance with BSI Standard 200-3 as the basis for the security concept.
- Preparation of an individual security concept including technical and organizational measures according to BSI IT-Grundschutz.
- Preparatory support for an optional certification according to BSI IT-Grundschutz.
- Adaptation of existing security policies and development of new ones for access controls, incident management and data protection.
- Consideration of municipality-specific requirements and integration of the measures into the existing IT infrastructure.
- Documentation of the results and preparation of audit-ready evidence for audits.
Tools, languages and frameworks used: MS Office, Verinice, IT-Grundschutz (200-x), NIS-2 (EU 2022/2555), ISMS, AI-Act (EU 2024/1989)
Enrique G.
Last position:
Security Architect at Capgemini
I implemented a Zero-Trust architecture for robust, military-grade maritime container mini data centers based on VMware & Tanzu to support containerized GIS workloads for ground forces. The main focus was on securing communications, workload protection, and data access in contested electronic battle environments affected by jamming, interception, signal manipulation, and constantly changing operational conditions. I designed and architected use cases so that every element of workload, identity, and system could continue to operate independently and securely even in degraded or disrupted scenarios. In parallel, I defined the enterprise and solution security architecture with LeanIX, Bizzdesign, and HOPEX as enterprise architecture, repository, and governance platforms to maintain architecture inventory, relationships, traceability, target pictures, and security governance in complex environments. For the architectural designs, I used Sparx Enterprise Architect to describe formal architecture views, interfaces, trust boundaries, and system architecture in both IT and OT environments. IriusRisk was used for threat modeling of the solution to identify architecture-driven risks, derive security requirements, and detect countermeasures and design gaps directly from the solution models. Risk and compliance management was supported with Archer. Architecture decisions, control gaps, and operational risks were translated into controlled governance and auditable compliance measures. For documentation, collaboration, and visual design, I used Confluence to maintain Architecture Decision Records, Security Blueprints, and workflows. I used Lucidchart and draw.io to create design artifacts tailored to stakeholders. I also defined OT security concepts with support from electrical and mechanical engineers in the areas of oil, vehicle onboard systems, rail, power plants, pharma, gas turbines, and nuclear technology. I created the end-to-end OT security strategy, starting with global policy, developed into standards and procedures, and finally aligned with Bell-LaPadula, Purdue Model, SABSA, TOGAF ADM, CENELEC 50701, IEC 62443, and NIST standards. In addition, I worked with engineering team leads to identify critical KBP assets and place them under protective measures that segmented SCADA, PLC, and HMI assets. I drove collaboration between Security, IT, and OT teams to create standardized workflows and use cases for the OT security solution catalog, while integrating Defense-in-Depth and Zero-Trust principles into operational environments. A key part of my work was integrating multidisciplinary engineering, security, and operations stakeholders into a unified security blueprinting strategy and ensuring that architecture, threat modeling, governance, and documentation were technically strong and operationally practical.
André B.
Last position:
External Attack Surface Assessment & Cybersecurity Readiness Checks at Graydaxe Cybersecurity GmbH
- Conducting cybersecurity readiness checks based on an in-house assessment methodology
- Analyzing the external attack surface using the Graydaxe EASM platform
- Assessing maturity levels and deriving prioritized recommendations for action
Sergey K.
Last position:
Managing Director Cybersecurity at CBA-Cybersecurity and Business Advisory GmbH
- Development of comprehensive services in cybersecurity, IT governance, and AI
- Building and delivering strategic security solutions such as vCISO service, ISMS, SOC-as-a-Service (SIEM, SOAR, use cases, playbooks, threat hunting, incident response), AI-driven risk and compliance tools, and frameworks for outsourcing and third-party risks
- Supporting companies in meeting regulatory requirements and certifications (ISMS, NIS-2, DORA, CRA, KRITIS, ISO 27001, TISAX, BSI IT Baseline Protection, EU AI Act)
- Promoting innovations in cybersecurity automation, AI governance, and secure digital transformation
- Responsible for company growth, client relations, and strategic partnerships
Sirak D.
Last position:
Cyber Security Support Engineer at Log(N) Pacific
- Implementing secure cloud configurations with Azure Private Link, Network Security Groups, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, and Azure Regulatory Compliance for NIST 800-53, PCI DSS, and HIPAA/HITRUST, resulting in an 88% reduction in security incidents over the same period.
- Troubleshooting and supporting Microsoft Azure services, including Microsoft Sentinel (SIEM), Virtual Machines, Azure Monitor, and Azure Active Directory.
- Developing KQL queries to support the Log Analytics workspace and Microsoft Sentinel, resulting in 1 new SIEM dashboard and 4 workbooks.
Max J.
Last position:
Demand Manager in Agile Projects at Automotiv
- Project coordination/project management
- Requirements management, process consulting, analysis of requirements, architecture – build-up and further development of an analytics platform (BI)
- Consulting and support in defining and implementing demand processes
- Requirements gathering / capture -> analysis and specification -> tracking and preparation for acceptance
- Preparation of test specifications and test execution
- Prioritization of requirements with customers
- Ensuring compliance with UX design guidelines.
- Specification of epics (use cases) and user stories
- Preparation, execution and evaluation of requirements and project workshops with the business area.
- Transfer of requirements into PI / sprint planning (SAFe)
- Project documentation
- Process documentation and modeling (UML / BPMN)
- Coordination and documentation of IT security measures (NIST)
- Coordination and documentation of SW architecture
- Use of AI models for text analysis (topic classification, summarization, sentiment analysis)
- MS Office, Enterprise Architect; Arch42 Confluence (Balsamiq, DrawIO, Gliffy for UML and BPMN); Jira (Agile, Plan, Structure, SAFe); Tableau
Discover over 15,000 top freelancers
Statistics of experts using NIST 800-53
Aggregated from the professional profiles of matched freelancers.
Experience
20 years
Position duration
1.8 years
Positions per freelancer
17
Top business areas
Information Technology, Project Management, Operations
Top industries
Information Technology, Banking and Finance, Energy
Certification focus areas
Information Technology, Audit, Project Management
Bachelor's degree or higher
80%
Master's degree or higher
20%
Certifications per freelancer
11
Most common languages
German, English, Spanish
Speak two or more languages
100%
Based on our profile pool as of 29 Oct 2026.
Daily rate distribution
The chart shows how the daily rates of experts in this technology in Germany are distributed, based on recent contracts on our platform. Each bar covers a rate range — its height shows the share of experts charging within that range.
Average rates of experts in Germany using NIST 800-53
Rates are based on recent contracts and do not include FRATCH margin.
The average daily rate is the mean of all daily rates from recent contracts of comparable freelancers on our platform.
The median daily rate is the middle value of all daily rates — half of comparable freelancers charge less, half charge more. Unlike the average, it is barely affected by outliers.
Calculated based on our freelancers’ daily rates as of 29 Oct 2026. Actual rates may vary depending on seniority level, experience, skill specialization, project complexity, and engagement length.
NIST 800-53 experts industry focus
See which industries our matched freelancers work in most often — every figure is calculated live from the freelancers on FRATCH.
- Information Technology (100%)
- Banking and Finance (86%)
- Energy (57%)
- Professional Services (57%)
- Food and Beverage (43%)
- Healthcare (43%)
- Manufacturing (43%)
- Retail (43%)
Please note that freelancers can work across multiple industries, so percentages overlap.
About the technology
Control framework
NIST 800-53, formally NIST Special Publication 800-53, is a catalog of security and privacy controls for information systems and organizations. It helps companies define safeguards, assign accountability and document how risks are managed. The framework supports control selection, tailoring and implementation rather than prescribing one fixed technical architecture.
Where it applies
Organizations use NIST 800-53 for cloud services, enterprise applications, government systems and environments that handle sensitive information. It is especially useful when procurement, governance or customer assurance requires a structured control set. In Germany, specialists may also align the framework with internal security policies and relevant European compliance obligations without treating it as a substitute for those requirements.
Control families
The framework groups controls into families covering access control, audit and accountability, configuration management, incident response, risk assessment, system integrity and supply chain risk management. Strong specialists connect these families to real processes, technical safeguards and evidence sources.
- Select and tailor control baselines
- Map controls to systems, owners and risks
- Define implementation statements and evidence
- Prepare assessment and remediation records
Ecosystem and tooling
NIST 800-53 work often connects with NIST SP 800-37, NIST SP 800-53A and the Risk Management Framework. Professionals may also use governance, risk and compliance tools, cloud security services, identity platforms, ticketing systems and configuration inventories. Useful adjacent knowledge includes security architecture, privacy controls, vulnerability management and audit preparation.
When to hire specialists
Freelance expertise helps when a company is creating a control program, moving regulated workloads to the cloud or preparing for an independent assessment. It is also valuable when existing documentation has gaps or control ownership is unclear.
- Establish a practical control baseline
- Translate requirements into operating procedures
- Review evidence and identify deficiencies
- Support remediation planning and assessment readiness
What quality looks like
A strong professional links every selected control to a clear risk, responsible owner, implementation status and reliable evidence. They distinguish policy language from implemented safeguards and explain exceptions without weakening the control objective. Look for experience with system boundaries, control inheritance, assessment methods and concise documentation that operational teams can maintain after the engagement.
Frequently asked questions
Questions about NIST 800-53? Start with the answers below.
NIST 800-53 is used to select, tailor and implement security and privacy controls for information systems and organizations. Companies use it to structure risk management, assign control ownership and prepare evidence for assessments or customer reviews.
NIST SP 800-53 provides a detailed catalog of controls, while ISO 27001 defines requirements for an information security management system and NIST CSF organizes cybersecurity outcomes and practices. They can be mapped together, but they serve different levels of detail and governance.
A strong NIST 800-53 professional usually understands the Risk Management Framework, NIST SP 800-53A, security architecture, cloud controls, identity management and audit evidence. Privacy risk, vulnerability management and governance, risk and compliance tooling are also valuable adjacent skills.
The right NIST 800-53 specialist depends on the scope and maturity of the environment. A focused control mapping task may need a narrower skill set, while baseline selection, system categorization and assessment readiness call for experience across governance, technology and evidence management.
NIST 800-53 work is often suitable for remote collaboration because interviews, document reviews and evidence analysis can take place online. On-site sessions may still help with workshops or sensitive environments, while German and English communication expectations should be agreed at the start.
Ask a NIST 800-53 professional to explain how they connect controls to risks, owners, system boundaries and evidence. High-quality work is specific, traceable and usable by operational teams; it does not rely on generic policy text or unchecked compliance claims.
A typical NIST 800-53 engagement may produce a tailored control baseline, system security plan inputs, control implementation statements, evidence registers and a remediation backlog. The exact deliverables should reflect the system scope, assessment method and responsibilities agreed with the company.
NIST 800-53 was created for federal information systems, but private companies also use it when they need a rigorous control structure for cloud services, sensitive data or public-sector customers. Its controls can be tailored to the organization’s risks instead of adopted without modification.
The average hourly rate of freelancers in Germany who have used NIST 800-53 in their recent projects is 108 €, which corresponds to a daily rate of about 866 € based on an 8-hour working day.
Of the freelancers in Germany who have used NIST 800-53 in their recent projects, 80% hold at least a Bachelor's degree and 20% hold at least a Master's degree.
On average, freelancers in Germany who have used NIST 800-53 in their recent projects have 20 years of professional experience, with a single engagement typically lasting around 1.8 years.
The most common languages among freelancers in Germany who have used NIST 800-53 in their recent projects are German (100%), English (100%), and Spanish (29%).
The most common industries among freelancers in Germany who have used NIST 800-53 in their recent projects are Information Technology (100%), Banking and Finance (86%), and Energy (57%).
The most common business areas among freelancers in Germany who have used NIST 800-53 in their recent projects are Information Technology (100%), Project Management (86%), and Operations (71%).
Main locations of FRATCH Experts, who have recently used NIST 800-53
Our freelancers and interim experts are at home across the DACH region — available on-site in the major business hubs or fully remote. Choose a location to discover matched specialists, local market insights and up-to-date availability.
Berlin Hamburg Munich Cologne Frankfurt Stuttgart Dusseldorf Leipzig Dortmund Essen Bremen Dresden Hanover Nuremberg Request a free demo
Get in touch with the FRATCH team and we will get back to you within 4 hours.
Would you rather directly get in touch?
We always have the time for a call or email!
Philipp Thomaschewski
FRATCH CEO
