Skip to main content
🇩🇪GDPR-compliant
Find the right

Dependency-Track Expert in Germany

for secure SBOM management, matched in minutes with vetted specialists

Hire experts who manage software bills of materials, connect CycloneDX and SPDX data, configure vulnerability policies, and integrate Dependency-Track into delivery workflows. FRATCH matches you quickly and precisely with vetted, available freelancers.

Meet FRATCH Experts in Germany, who have recently used Dependency-Track

Verified expert

Ronald M.

View profile

DevOps Consultant

Munich
Ronald M.

Last position:

DevOps Consultant at M.it services & systems GmbH

  • Adaptation, optimization, configuration, and administration of a multi-stage GitLab instance with over 250 users
  • Setup, adaptation, expansion, and optimization of infrastructure, configuration, and monitoring
  • Provisioning of services and handover to production
  • System environment: DependencyTrack, GitLab, Grafana, Hedgedoc, Kubernetes, Oauth2 Proxy, Openstack, Prometheus, Syseleven
Verified expert

Enrique G.

View profile

Data Security

Hamburg
Enrique G.

Last position:

Security Architect at Capgemini

I implemented a Zero-Trust architecture for robust, military-grade maritime container mini data centers based on VMware & Tanzu to support containerized GIS workloads for ground forces. The main focus was on securing communications, workload protection, and data access in contested electronic battle environments affected by jamming, interception, signal manipulation, and constantly changing operational conditions. I designed and architected use cases so that every element of workload, identity, and system could continue to operate independently and securely even in degraded or disrupted scenarios. In parallel, I defined the enterprise and solution security architecture with LeanIX, Bizzdesign, and HOPEX as enterprise architecture, repository, and governance platforms to maintain architecture inventory, relationships, traceability, target pictures, and security governance in complex environments. For the architectural designs, I used Sparx Enterprise Architect to describe formal architecture views, interfaces, trust boundaries, and system architecture in both IT and OT environments. IriusRisk was used for threat modeling of the solution to identify architecture-driven risks, derive security requirements, and detect countermeasures and design gaps directly from the solution models. Risk and compliance management was supported with Archer. Architecture decisions, control gaps, and operational risks were translated into controlled governance and auditable compliance measures. For documentation, collaboration, and visual design, I used Confluence to maintain Architecture Decision Records, Security Blueprints, and workflows. I used Lucidchart and draw.io to create design artifacts tailored to stakeholders. I also defined OT security concepts with support from electrical and mechanical engineers in the areas of oil, vehicle onboard systems, rail, power plants, pharma, gas turbines, and nuclear technology. I created the end-to-end OT security strategy, starting with global policy, developed into standards and procedures, and finally aligned with Bell-LaPadula, Purdue Model, SABSA, TOGAF ADM, CENELEC 50701, IEC 62443, and NIST standards. In addition, I worked with engineering team leads to identify critical KBP assets and place them under protective measures that segmented SCADA, PLC, and HMI assets. I drove collaboration between Security, IT, and OT teams to create standardized workflows and use cases for the OT security solution catalog, while integrating Defense-in-Depth and Zero-Trust principles into operational environments. A key part of my work was integrating multidisciplinary engineering, security, and operations stakeholders into a unified security blueprinting strategy and ensuring that architecture, threat modeling, governance, and documentation were technically strong and operationally practical.

Verified expert

Halil O.

View profile

Principal Cloud & DevSecOps Architect (AWS / Azure / Terraform / Kubernetes / CI-CD)

Bonn
Halil O.

Last position:

Senior Cloud Operations & DevSecOps Engineer (Azure / Terraform / CI-CD) at KfW Bankengruppe

  • Regulated environment within a German banking group (approx. 8,500 employees, hybrid cloud strategy).

  • Responsible for operating, provisioning, and continuously securing business-critical platforms – including a GenAI chat application, a big data/AI platform, and data science workspaces based on Azure Virtual Desktops and VMs. Ownership of Azure DevOps projects for ShaiHulud and React2Shell, as well as BSI alerts – Security Operations improvements across the SDLC.

  • Deployment responsibility for the GenAI chat application, big data/AI platform (BDAI), and data science workspaces (AVD/VM-based) in the respective landing zones.

  • Deployment & release management: end-to-end responsibility for deploying portal and service applications across multiple Azure landing zones, including technical approvals, compliance with development team deployment guidelines, and ensuring ITIL-based change and release processes via ServiceNow.

  • Azure landing zones & network architecture: design, provisioning, and operation of Azure landing zones for 3-tier web applications with enhanced network segmentation, VNet peering, hub-and-spoke architectures, private endpoints, and firewall integration across separate subscriptions and tenants.

  • Azure DevOps governance & operations: ownership of the Azure DevOps organization, including projects, repositories, and CI/CD pipelines; implementation of governance requirements such as branch policies, approval gates, permission models, and audit-ready operating structures.

  • Infrastructure as Code (Terraform): design, implementation, and operation of a modular Terraform architecture for standardized cloud infrastructure deployment, including state management, provider versioning, reusability, and policy-as-code approaches.

  • CI/CD pipeline engineering: design, operation, and optimization of complex YAML-based CI/CD pipelines with multi-stage deployments, template standardization, self-hosted agents, integrated secret management, and automated quality and security checks.

  • Git migration & platform consolidation: planning and execution of repository and pipeline migration from Azure DevOps to GitLab CI/CD, including automated scripts, full Git history transfer, pipeline porting, and platform consolidation.

  • Container & platform operations (AKS): operation and security assessment of containerized workloads on Azure Kubernetes Service, centralization of on-premises container registries for ACR.

  • OpenShift (OCP) security reviews: security assessment of code baselines, build pipelines, and deployment processes for on-premises OpenShift clusters with critical applications, and derivation of specific hardening recommendations.

  • Shift-left security & DevSecOps transformation: introduction of a company-wide shift-left approach for early security integration in development and deployment processes, enabling developers to perform self-led security checks and sustainably reduce vulnerabilities before production (IDE integrations, pre-commit hooks, local scanners).

  • Software supply chain security: analysis and mitigation of supply chain risks in NPM- and Yarn-based applications through dependency audits, CI/CD pipeline hardening, token rotation, and restriction of risky build and lifecycle mechanisms.

  • Frontend & framework security (React / Next.js): security assessment and coordination of critical vulnerability remediation across platform applications and web frameworks, including coordination and complementary technical mitigations with all teams following BSI alerts.

  • Software composition analysis (SCA): introduction and operation of automated vulnerability scans for container images, pipelines/artifacts, and third-party dependencies, including SBOM exports within CI/CD pipelines.

  • SAST/DAST integration: design and piloting of static and dynamic application security tests in close collaboration with security architecture and development teams, for continuous improvement of code and runtime security, and establishing operational acceptance tests.

  • Artifact & registry consolidation: analysis and consolidation of all package and container repositories for service applications and AKS workloads, aiming for a centralized, secured registry strategy with centralized vulnerability scanning and governance.

  • Dependency-Track & SBOM strategy: advising the compliance board on introducing a central SBOM and vulnerability management platform to increase enterprise-wide dependency transparency and accelerate CVE response capability.

  • CI/CD pipeline hardening: security analysis and cleanup of the existing pipeline landscape by removing unused pipelines, improving secrets hygiene, implementing least-privilege principles, and isolating build agent environments.

  • Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) optimization: analysis and tuning of existing Azure WAF rules (OWASP Top 10 Core Rule Set, DSR/SDC, custom rules) to defend against known vulnerabilities and exploit patterns, including reducing false positives and improving threat detection.

  • Documentation & stakeholder communication: creating and maintaining technical documentation, runbooks, and architecture overviews in Jira and Confluence, as well as active knowledge transfer between operations, development, security, and compliance stakeholders.

Verified expert

Tobias E.

View profile

C# Fullstack Developer / Scrum Master / Product Owner Cloud Services / Product Owner Infrastructure & Core Services / Head of

Geiselhöring
Tobias E.

Last position:

C# Fullstack Developer / Scrum Master / Product Owner Cloud Services / Product Owner Infrastructure & Core Services / Head of at TRUMPF Werkzeugmaschinen SE & Co. KG

  • Many years of work in different roles within the MES product area, with technical development, agile leadership, and strategic product responsibility for key MES components.
  • As C# Fullstack Developer / Scrum Master (2018–2020): further development of a programming system for laser machines, introduction and moderation of Scrum processes, quality assurance through automated tests and documentation.
  • As Product Owner Cloud Services (2019–2020): leadership of two AWS-based cloud services for providing laser data and legal documents, definition of the product vision, backlog maintenance, and stakeholder communication.
  • As Product Owner Infrastructure & Core Services / Head of DevOps / Product Security (2020–2025): responsibility for core MES components such as Service Orchestrator, Licensing Service, IAM, and AppLauncher, building and maintaining Azure DevOps pipelines for over 70 components, and introducing security standards (CRA).
  • Company-wide contact for Azure DevOps and largely responsible for its introduction.
  • Standardized versioning of all components.
  • Structuring of CI/CD and release pipelines.
  • Building an agent scale set with special software configuration.
  • Connecting Azure DevOps with ServiceNow.
  • Standardizing the integration of security tools such as SonarCloud, Dependency Track, and digital signing.
  • Technologies & tools: .NET (C#, 4.8 / Core 3.x / 8), WPF, WCF, REST, OData, JSON, DevExpress, Duende IDP, Azure DevOps, AWS, PowerBI, SonarCloud, Dependency Track, Visual Studio Pro.
  • Method: Scrum.
  • Project language: German / English.
Verified expert

Nils K.

View profile

Vulnerability management and secure SDLC

Lübeck
Nils K.

Last position:

Vulnerability management and secure SDLC at DB InfraGO AG

  • Successful implementation of vulnerability management with DefectDojo
  • Consulting and implementation of technical and process-related aspects of vulnerability management with DefectDojo
  • Consulting on the implementation of a secure software development lifecycle
  • Skills: Gitlab, DefectDojo, Vulnerability Management, SCA, SAST, DAST, Python, Kubernetes, ArgoCD, Docker, AWS, Azure, Whitesource/Mend, Greenbone
Verified expert

Mirko H.

View profile

Cybersecurity Manager

Leimen
Mirko H.

Last position:

Cybersecurity Manager at Joynext GmbH

Cybersecurity for RTCU project for the Stellantis Group.

The management of cybersecurity was strongly criticized by the customer Stellantis, questioning competence. Requirements were missing or incomplete, the architecture for cybersecurity controls was non-existent, and documentation such as cybersecurity plans and concepts were incomplete and formally incorrect.

  • Building customer trust and de-escalation
  • Sprint planning with the customer based on SAFe
  • Task-force management
  • Switching planning and control to an agile approach
  • Review and update of cybersecurity documents
  • Communication and problem solving with suppliers, particularly Rolling Wireless and Autocrypt
  • Internal workshops and coordination across various hierarchy levels from developers to CTO
  • Coordination of work packages and implementation across locations in Dresden, Ningbo, and Oborniki
  • Reporting and support of cybersecurity audits
  • Coaching of Joynext cybersecurity managers
  • De-escalation of critical customer issues
  • Acceleration of requirement creation and release by a factor of 5
  • Timely provision of 3rd party components
  • Reduction of vulnerability management effort by factor 3
  • Creation of cybersecurity documents conformant to existing standards
  • Technologies and Methods: V-Modell, ASPICE, IREB, ISTQB, Scrum, Kanban, SAFe, PMP, IPMA, BPMN 2.0, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Project, Jira, Confluence, Siemens Polarion, Dependency Track

Discover over 15,000 top freelancers

Statistics of experts using Dependency-Track

Aggregated from the professional profiles of matched freelancers.

Experience

19 years

Dependency-Track experts in Germany have 19 years of professional experience on average.

Position duration

2.2 years

Dependency-Track experts in Germany stay in a single position for 2.2 years on average.

Positions per freelancer

13

Dependency-Track experts in Germany have completed 13 positions on average over the course of their careers.

Top business areas

Information Technology, Project Management, Operations

Dependency-Track experts in Germany have gathered most of their hands-on project experience in Information Technology, Project Management, and Operations.

Top industries

Information Technology, Manufacturing, Energy

Dependency-Track experts in Germany are most in demand in Information Technology, Manufacturing, and Energy.

Certification focus areas

Information Technology, Product Development, Project Management

Dependency-Track experts in Germany earn their certifications most often in Information Technology, Product Development, and Project Management.

Bachelor's degree or higher

67%

67% of Dependency-Track experts in Germany hold at least a Bachelor's degree.

Master's degree or higher

50%

50% of Dependency-Track experts in Germany hold at least a Master's degree.

Certifications per freelancer

9

Dependency-Track experts in Germany hold 9 professional certifications on average.

Most common languages

German, English, Spanish

Dependency-Track experts in Germany most often speak German, English, and Spanish.

Speak two or more languages

100%

100% of Dependency-Track experts in Germany speak two or more languages.

Based on our profile pool as of 19 Sep 2026.

Daily rate distribution

0 1 2 3 4
2 of the Dependency-Track experts in Germany charge less than €640 per day.
One of the Dependency-Track experts in Germany charges between €720 and €800 per day.
One of the Dependency-Track experts in Germany charges between €800 and €880 per day.
One of the Dependency-Track experts in Germany charges between €880 and €960 per day.
2 of the Dependency-Track experts in Germany charge €960 or more per day.
<€640 €720-​800 €800-​880 €880-​960 €960+

The chart shows how the daily rates of freelancers in this technology in Germany are distributed, based on recent contracts on our platform. Each bar covers a rate range — its height shows how many freelancers charge within that range.

Average rates of experts in Germany using Dependency-Track

Rates are based on recent contracts and do not include FRATCH margin.

1000
750
500
250
Rate comparison chart
Daily rate avg. 800 €

The average daily rate is the mean of all daily rates from recent contracts of comparable freelancers on our platform.

1000
750
500
250
Rate comparison chart
Median rate 800 €

The median daily rate is the middle value of all daily rates — half of comparable freelancers charge less, half charge more. Unlike the average, it is barely affected by outliers.

Calculated based on our freelancers’ daily rates as of 19 Sep 2026. Actual rates may vary depending on seniority level, experience, skill specialization, project complexity, and engagement length.

Dependency-Track experts industry focus

See which industries our matched freelancers work in most often — every figure is calculated live from the freelancers on FRATCH.

  • Information Technology (100%)
  • Manufacturing (86%)
  • Energy (43%)
  • Banking and Finance (43%)
  • Healthcare (43%)
  • Transportation (43%)
  • Professional Services (43%)
  • Government and Administration (43%)

Please note that freelancers can work across multiple industries, so percentages overlap.

About the technology

Purpose and scope

Dependency-Track is an open-source platform from OWASP for monitoring the security and compliance of software components. It consumes software bills of materials, or SBOMs, and tracks components, versions, vulnerabilities, licenses and policy violations across products. Companies use it to create an ongoing view of supply-chain risk rather than relying only on point-in-time scans.

SBOM workflows

Dependency-Track works with SBOM data in formats such as CycloneDX and SPDX. Experts design processes that publish inventories from build pipelines, register applications and services, and keep component relationships current as releases change. They also help teams distinguish direct dependencies from transitive ones and connect findings to owners and remediation work.

Ecosystem and integrations

The platform fits into modern application security environments through its REST API, notification system and integration options. Relevant skills include CI/CD tooling, container registries, vulnerability intelligence, identity and access management, and data automation. Strong professionals understand how Dependency-Track relates to tools such as Jenkins, GitLab, GitHub Actions, Kubernetes and enterprise security workflows.

Common project work

  • Import and validate CycloneDX or SPDX SBOMs from build pipelines
  • Configure projects, teams, permissions and portfolio views
  • Set vulnerability, license and component policies
  • Connect notifications, ticketing and security operations workflows
  • Improve data quality, retention and reporting through the API

When specialists help

Companies often bring in freelance expertise when they are introducing an SBOM practice, consolidating software supply-chain data or moving Dependency-Track into production. In Germany, collaboration may involve remote delivery across locations or on-site work with product security and compliance teams. Clear technical English is common, while German can support workshops and stakeholder communication.

What strong professionals bring

Strong Dependency-Track specialists combine application security knowledge with practical delivery experience. They can explain whether a finding is actionable, tune policies without hiding meaningful risk, and trace a vulnerable component through products and releases. They document integrations, protect sensitive inventory data and leave teams with maintainable workflows instead of a manually managed dashboard.

Published on:
FRATCH GPT

FRATCH GPT delivers freelancer proposals with clear reasoning and transparent pricing in minutes, helping your hiring department quickly and compliantly find the best talent.

Give it a try:

Try FRATCH GPT

Frequently asked questions

Questions about Dependency-Track? Start with the answers below.

Dependency-Track is used to analyze and monitor software bills of materials across applications, services and releases. It helps companies identify vulnerable components, license concerns and policy violations, then route relevant findings into remediation workflows.

OWASP Dependency-Track focuses on SBOM ingestion, portfolio visibility and continuous component monitoring after inventories are created. It can complement repository and pipeline scanners, while its open architecture gives companies more control over data, integrations and deployment.

A strong Dependency-Track specialist usually understands CycloneDX, SPDX, CI/CD pipelines and vulnerability intelligence. Experience with containers, Kubernetes, REST APIs, identity controls, ticketing systems and software supply-chain governance is also valuable.

The right level depends on the scope. A focused SBOM import may need familiarity with the platform and build tooling, while an enterprise rollout calls for experience with portfolio design, access controls, policy tuning, integrations and change management.

Yes. Dependency-Track work is often well suited to remote collaboration because configuration, API work and pipeline integration can be reviewed online. On-site sessions may still help with security workshops, internal approvals or coordination across German-speaking teams.

Ask for a clear explanation of how they would model products, import SBOMs, manage transitive components and handle false positives. A capable Dependency-Track expert should also discuss policy ownership, data protection, integration testing and operational handover.

DTrack does not replace every vulnerability scanner or source analysis tool. It provides a central view of component risk based on SBOMs and related intelligence, so companies commonly use it alongside scanners that create inventories or inspect source, images and running environments.

Freelancers working with Dependency-Track should clarify the available SBOM formats, product ownership model, deployment environment and vulnerability sources before starting. They should also establish how findings are prioritized, who receives notifications and how component data will be maintained after delivery.

The average hourly rate of freelancers in Germany who have used Dependency-Track in their recent projects is 100 €, which corresponds to a daily rate of about 800 € based on an 8-hour working day.

Of the freelancers in Germany who have used Dependency-Track in their recent projects, 67% hold at least a Bachelor's degree and 50% hold at least a Master's degree.

On average, freelancers in Germany who have used Dependency-Track in their recent projects have 19 years of professional experience, with a single engagement typically lasting around 2.2 years.

The most common languages among freelancers in Germany who have used Dependency-Track in their recent projects are German (100%), English (100%), and Spanish (29%).

The most common industries among freelancers in Germany who have used Dependency-Track in their recent projects are Information Technology (100%), Manufacturing (86%), and Energy (43%).

The most common business areas among freelancers in Germany who have used Dependency-Track in their recent projects are Information Technology (100%), Project Management (86%), and Operations (71%).

Main locations of FRATCH Experts, who have recently used Dependency-Track

Our freelancers and interim experts are at home across the DACH region — available on-site in the major business hubs or fully remote. Choose a location to discover matched specialists, local market insights and up-to-date availability.

Berlin Hamburg Munich Cologne Frankfurt Stuttgart Dusseldorf Leipzig Dortmund Essen Bremen Dresden Hanover Nuremberg

Request a free demo

Get in touch with the FRATCH team and we will get back to you within 4 hours.

Contact form

Would you rather directly get in touch?
We always have the time for a call or email!

FRATCH CEO avatar

Philipp Thomaschewski

FRATCH CEO

LinkedInFRATCH