Skip to main content
🇩🇪GDPR-compliant
Find the right

Azure Policy Experts in Germany

in minutes with precise AI matching and vetted, available freelancers

Hire experts who define governance rules, enforce Azure resource standards and connect policy controls with Azure Blueprints, Defender for Cloud and Microsoft Entra ID. Get matched quickly with vetted, available freelancers suited to your project.

Meet FRATCH Experts in Germany, who have recently used Azure Policy

Verified expert

Oliver K.

View profile

Senior Azure & Microsoft Identity Architect

Haßmersheim
Oliver K.

Last position:

Azure Cloud Engineer at DVAG-Deutsche Vermögensberatung AG

Financial services provider, >10,000 employees

  • Entra ID: App Registrations, Hybrid Identities, group and permission concepts, Conditional Access, MFA, RBAC, and PIM.
  • Azure IaaS/PaaS, Networking, Security, Governance, Monitoring, and automation with Bicep and PowerShell.
  • Consulting and technical support for internal cloud projects.
Verified expert

Frédéric K.

View profile

IT Consultant, Architect, Full Stack, DevOps

Walpertskirchen
Frédéric K.

Last position:

Project Manager (Enterprise Cloud Governance) at CompuGroup Medical SE & Co. KGaA

  • Short description: Lead a group-wide project to establish standardized cloud governance for Microsoft Azure, including policies, security and compliance controls, automation, and cost and operations control while preserving the autonomy of decentralized business units within regulatory boundaries.

  • Tasks and activities:

  • Overall responsibility for the design, setup, and implementation of an enterprise-wide cloud governance structure (Azure), incl. target picture, roadmap, and operating model.

  • Management of internal and external stakeholders (C-level, IT, Security, Compliance, Cloud Architecture, DevOps) incl. decision-making and escalation management.

  • Planning and facilitation of workshops on cloud strategy, governance principles, and the design of areas such as Identity, Connectivity, and Platform Management.

  • Definition, implementation, and rollout of cloud policies (Azure Policy / custom policies), security standards, and compliance requirements (including GDPR, ISO 27001, BSI C5).

  • Building a cloud governance framework aligned with the Azure Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF), incl. landing zone and guardrail concepts.

  • Introduction of automation solutions for governance, security, and cost control (policy/control automation, IaC, CI/CD-based control mechanisms).

  • Implementation of cloud security and compliance monitoring mechanisms as well as continuous improvement processes.

  • Establishment and operationalization of FinOps in an enterprise environment (central and decentralized FinOps teams), incl. cost management strategies, reporting, and guardrails.

  • Integration of governance policies into DevOps processes (e.g. CI/CD principles for security and compliance checks, GitLab Runner concept in spokes, GitLab CI/CD for CAF landing zones).

  • Implementation of access concepts incl. RBAC design and "break glass" mechanisms (emergency access) as well as certificate automation (ACME / step-ca).

  • Achievements:

  • Created a unified, auditable governance and control set for Azure (policies, standards, compliance mapping) and thus laid the foundation for scalable cloud usage in a regulated environment.

  • Established repeatable automation for governance, security, and cost control (IaC + CI/CD), reducing manual effort and implementation risks.

  • Improved operational and decision-making capabilities across central and decentralized units (clearer roles, responsibilities, escalation paths, balance between autonomy and group requirements).

  • Significantly increased workload compliance for lift-and-shift migrations.

  • Technologies used:

  • Microsoft Azure Policy, custom policies.

  • Terraform, OpenTofu, Terragrunt.

  • step-ca (ACME).

  • Entra ID.

  • Azure Firewall.

  • Azure networking, hub-and-spoke architecture.

  • Azure vWAN (evaluation).

  • Azure Front Door, Azure Application Gateway.

  • Azure ExpressRoute.

  • Azure Key Vault.

  • NetBox.

  • GitLab (on-premises).

  • Infrastructure, concepts used:

  • Cloud shared responsibility model.

  • Hub-and-spoke connectivity / central shared services (from a hub-spoke context).

  • Central governance with decentralized delivery (business unit autonomy with guardrails).

  • Methods used:

  • Scrum.

  • Stakeholder management (C-level to engineering).

  • Cloud governance, Azure Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF).

  • DevOps, CI/CD.

  • Cost and FinOps approaches: tagging/chargeback models, budget/alert concepts, reserved instances/savings plans vs. on-demand scenarios, sensitivity analyses.

  • RBAC, "break glass" concepts.

  • ACME / certificate automation.

  • GitLab Runner concept in spokes, GitLab CI/CD pipelines for CAF landing zones.

Verified expert

Gyan P.

View profile

Senior Azure Cloud & DevOps Architect

Berlin
Gyan P.

Last position:

Senior DevOps & Cloud Architect, Head of Infrastructure at Bosch

  • Azure Landing Zone architecture: Design and implement a hub-spoke, multi-region-capable Azure landing zone that provides the secure, scalable and highly available foundation for autonomous driving and parking data/ML platforms.
  • Compliance through Azure Policy: Enforce security and compliance standards across Azure subscriptions via Azure Policy (guardrails, deny/audit/deploy-if-not-exists), consistently achieving top-tier infrastructure security scores.
  • Infrastructure-as-Code: Automate provisioning and configuration of Azure resources with Terraform and Bicep, with changes delivered through reviewed CI/CD pipelines.
  • Azure Databricks and Unity Catalog: Extensive experience operating Azure Databricks with Unity Catalog for centralized data governance, access control, lineage and auditing across workspaces.
  • Monitoring and observability: Built and run infrastructure monitoring and logging with Azure Monitor, Prometheus, Grafana and Loki, covering platform health, alerting, troubleshooting and capacity trends.
  • Platform at scale: Architected and operate cloud data/ML platforms supporting multi-PB vehicle data ingestion and simulation; orchestrate Argo Workflow-based recompute and autolabeling services scaling to 100k+ concurrent pods on AKS.
  • Reproducible ML: Established reproducible training environments with dataset versioning and provenance tracking, enabling auditing and experiment reliability.
  • Operational excellence: Automated GitHub organization management and CI/CD pipelines, improving developer productivity and deployment reliability; automated recurring operational processes.
  • FinOps: Developed transparent resource utilization and cost-tracking for multi-project Azure environments.
  • Leadership: Technical lead for infrastructure topics, collaborating with development, DevOps and security teams; technical interviewer and recruitment panel member for scaling the engineering team.
Verified expert

Alexandru G.

View profile

Head of Cloud Infrastructure

Munich
Alexandru G.

Last position:

Principal Cloud DevOps Architect at BP

In my role as Senior Cloud DevOps Architect for BP, an oil and gas company, I had the mission to migrate the Electric Vehicle Charging platform of the EV Division from on-premises and Azure to AWS cloud, resulting in a hybrid multi-cloud, multi-tenant SaaS solution.

Deployment with Kubernetes for the application layer meant provisioning Kubernetes clusters managed by EKS and AKS, with a focus on integrating them into a multi-tenant environment. This integration was achieved by using Kubernetes namespaces and access controls to ensure data isolation and privacy enforcement.

In the database layer, we chose an RDS instance with PostgreSQL to support the backend infrastructure of our applications. Tenants shared the same RDS instance, but each had a dedicated schema.

To ingest near real-time data from physical charge points (CPOs), as IoT devices, via the OCPI protocol, we ran into significant delays with batch processing. As a result, we built a real-time streaming data pipeline using Apache Kafka, while prioritizing an event-driven architecture.

Led collaboration across multiple internal teams, external vendors, cloud providers, and on-site partners to integrate over five systems into a unified solution.

Achievements:

  • Successfully designed and implemented hybrid multi-cloud solutions, integrating multiple cloud platforms (AWS, Azure) with on-premises infrastructure, using Site-to-Site VPNs, Firewalls, and Load Balancing.
  • Led the migration of on-premises infrastructure to multi-cloud, multi-tenant infrastructure, resulting in 30% faster processing times.
  • Migrated workloads from VMware and Hyper-V environments to cloud-based VMs, leveraging cloud-native services to optimize performance, cost efficiency, and scalability.
  • Designed a multi-tenant Kubernetes platform leveraging the Kubernetes ecosystem, using Karpenter for dynamic EC2 node provisioning, KEDA for event-driven pod autoscaling (e.g., Kafka message lag), and Rancher for centralized monitoring of multiple clusters (EKS, AKS, or on-prem K8s), replacing Microsoft-centric Azure Arc management service.
  • Designed and implemented Python-based FastAPI microservices as part of the EV core-backend on AWS EKS application layer, powering data ingestion and customer analytics pipelines.
  • Developed asynchronous, event-driven APIs (Python-FastAPI) for real-time integration with CPOs, supporting OCPI 2.3 and OICP protocols.
  • Designed and implemented a secure, production-grade Azure Databricks platform using Terraform, ensuring scalability and cost efficiency.
  • Migrated on-premises ERP to a hybrid Dynamics 365 architecture with ERP hosted locally and CRM running in Azure, integrated via Azure Arc.
  • Automated CI/CD pipelines for Databricks notebooks and jobs using GitHub Actions & Databricks CLI, reducing deployment time. Reduced infrastructure provisioning time by 70% by automating cloud resource deployment with GitOps.
  • Ensured compliance with internal audit and data governance standards (GDPR) through OAuth2/OIDC-based authentication and fine-grained role-based access controls.
  • Developed a Zero Trust security model, enforcing least-privilege access and microsegmentation, enhancing security posture and compliance with GDPR and NIST.
  • Built interactive analytics dashboards in Amazon QuickSight, integrating data from S3 and Redshift to deliver real-time business insights and visualizations with embedded access for multi-tenant users.
  • Led cloud security assessments and full-lifecycle cybersecurity integration during M&A, covering AWS, Azure, IAM (Entra ID), and data protection, while aligning security posture with NIST, ISO 27001, and GDPR across hybrid and cloud-native environments.
  • Reduced cloud costs by 64% for a client's dev environment by implementing automated start/stop schedules for EC2 and RDS instances via AWS CDK with EventBridge Scheduler or AWS Systems Manager.

Tech stack:

  • Infrastructure as Code: Terraform, AWS CDK, Ansible.
  • Containers: Kubernetes on EKS, AKS, Docker.
  • Streaming Data Processing: Kafka to Confluent Cloud, after AWS MSK.
  • Frontend: TypeScript, React, NextJS, Hooks, Styled Components.
  • Backend: Python with FastAPI, also Node.js with NestJS.
  • Database: Aurora on PostgreSQL with TypeORM, RDS on SQL Server, Azure Databricks full setup and administration, ETL Pipelines.
  • CI/CD and GitOps: GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps, ArgoCD.
  • Monitoring and Observability: Prometheus and Grafana.
  • Virtualization: Hyper-V, VMware Cloud on AWS, Azure Migrate.
  • ERP Systems: Odoo, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central on Azure, integrated with Azure Arc.
  • Networking: Site-to-Site VPNs, AWS Direct Connect, Azure ExpressRoute, Firewalls (AWS Network Firewall, Azure Firewall).
  • Security: IAM, NIST Framework, Zero Trust Security, AWS WAF, AWS Shield, GuardDuty.
Verified expert

Vivekanandhan S.

View profile

DevOps Consultant/Site Reliability Engineer

Augsburg
Vivekanandhan S.

Last position:

DevOps Consultant/Site Reliability Engineer at IONOS

  • Manage multiple Kubernetes clusters in Production with Ceph as storage layer.
  • Implemented CICD pipelines for automating deployments with Gitlab CI
  • Terraform for Infrastructure provisioning.
  • Claude code
  • Helm charts for deploying via ArgoCD
  • Implemented automated incident notification pipelines in Kubernetes to align with NIS2 mandatory 24-hour early warning disclosure rules
  • Configured Azure Policy and Logging guardrails aligned with BSI IT-Grundschutz (SYS.1.3 / OPS.1.1), ensuring continuous baseline compliance across 50+ cloud workloads

Environment: Gitlab CI, IONOS Cloud, Ceph, ArgoCD, terraform, Elastic cluster, Grafana, Alert Manager & Prometheus

Verified expert

Michael R.

View profile

Software Developer

Langenselbold
Michael R.

Last position:

Software Developer

  • Automatic creation of reports based on log data from the Senstar surveillance camera software regarding access times for various camera systems
  • Gathering requirements and translating them into a suitable technological solution
  • Implementation of Python scripts to read, process, and convert Senstar log data into PDF reports
  • Reading configuration files to control the scripts
  • Packaging the Python scripts and all dependencies as an executable cmd. Offline installation on Windows Server
  • Providing –help parameters to list and explain the script parameters
  • Creation of documentation for installing, configuring, and operating the scripts
  • Technical environment: Python 3, SQL, Senstar, Windows Server, Python Setuptools, fpdf
Verified expert

Enrique G.

View profile

Data Security

Hamburg
Enrique G.

Last position:

Security Architect at Capgemini

I implemented a Zero-Trust architecture for robust, military-grade maritime container mini data centers based on VMware & Tanzu to support containerized GIS workloads for ground forces. The main focus was on securing communications, workload protection, and data access in contested electronic battle environments affected by jamming, interception, signal manipulation, and constantly changing operational conditions. I designed and architected use cases so that every element of workload, identity, and system could continue to operate independently and securely even in degraded or disrupted scenarios. In parallel, I defined the enterprise and solution security architecture with LeanIX, Bizzdesign, and HOPEX as enterprise architecture, repository, and governance platforms to maintain architecture inventory, relationships, traceability, target pictures, and security governance in complex environments. For the architectural designs, I used Sparx Enterprise Architect to describe formal architecture views, interfaces, trust boundaries, and system architecture in both IT and OT environments. IriusRisk was used for threat modeling of the solution to identify architecture-driven risks, derive security requirements, and detect countermeasures and design gaps directly from the solution models. Risk and compliance management was supported with Archer. Architecture decisions, control gaps, and operational risks were translated into controlled governance and auditable compliance measures. For documentation, collaboration, and visual design, I used Confluence to maintain Architecture Decision Records, Security Blueprints, and workflows. I used Lucidchart and draw.io to create design artifacts tailored to stakeholders. I also defined OT security concepts with support from electrical and mechanical engineers in the areas of oil, vehicle onboard systems, rail, power plants, pharma, gas turbines, and nuclear technology. I created the end-to-end OT security strategy, starting with global policy, developed into standards and procedures, and finally aligned with Bell-LaPadula, Purdue Model, SABSA, TOGAF ADM, CENELEC 50701, IEC 62443, and NIST standards. In addition, I worked with engineering team leads to identify critical KBP assets and place them under protective measures that segmented SCADA, PLC, and HMI assets. I drove collaboration between Security, IT, and OT teams to create standardized workflows and use cases for the OT security solution catalog, while integrating Defense-in-Depth and Zero-Trust principles into operational environments. A key part of my work was integrating multidisciplinary engineering, security, and operations stakeholders into a unified security blueprinting strategy and ensuring that architecture, threat modeling, governance, and documentation were technically strong and operationally practical.

Verified expert

Hichem B.

View profile

IT Security Consultant & Data Engineer / Freelancer

Augsburg
Hichem B.

Last position:

IT Security Consultant & Data Engineer / Freelancer at datadefend GmbH

  • Analysis and further development of the security architecture.
  • Design and development of Splunk apps and technical add-ons (TAs).
  • Development and implementation of security use cases in the Splunk SIEM.
  • Creation and maintenance of incident response playbooks in Cortex XSOAR.
  • Support of technical proof-of-concepts to assess new detection technologies.
  • Lifecycle management and operational support for Splunk and Cribl systems.
  • Deployment and scaling of Splunk indexers in hybrid data center environments.
  • Maintenance, update planning, and optimization of Cribl Stream & Edge for log ingestion and data routing.
  • Creation of dashboards and reports to visualize security posture and system availability.
  • Technical analysis to assess network topologies and data flows.
  • Integration of new data sources via Cribl Stream/Edge and heavy forwarders in cloud and on-prem environments.
  • Integration of external security components such as Cortex XSOAR (SOAR) and user behavior analytics (UBA).
  • Implementation of complex correlation rules in Splunk Enterprise Security (ES).
  • Connection of external ticketing systems via mail gateways and REST APIs.
  • Automated deployment of use cases, dashboards, and detection rules via Git and Ansible.
Verified expert

Ensar Y.

View profile

Service Manager Microsoft Cloud Services (ITIL)

Berlin
Ensar Y.

Last position:

Service Manager Microsoft Cloud Services (ITIL) at Industry (technology group)

  • Took on the role of Service Manager for Microsoft 365 and Azure services
  • Coordinated service providers in the areas of collaboration and security (Exchange Online, Teams, Azure AD)
  • Monitored and optimized SLA-compliant operating processes (Incident, Change, Problem)
  • Worked closely with internal IT management and integrated ITIL processes into Azure DevOps
  • Microsoft Azure, Exchange Online, Teams, Azure AD, ITIL v4, Azure DevOps, Power BI, ServiceNow
Verified expert

Denis F.

View profile

IT Security Consultant

Heilbronn
Denis F.

Last position:

IT Security Consultant at Logistikdienstleister

  • Setting up a centralized security monitoring system (SIEM)
  • Integrating and onboarding log sources (Windows, network, applications)
  • Developing dashboards and alert structures
  • Structuring data models for efficient analysis

Discover over 15,000 top freelancers

Statistics of experts using Azure Policy

Aggregated from the professional profiles of matched freelancers.

Experience

17 years

Azure Policy experts in Germany have 17 years of professional experience on average.

Position duration

2 years

Azure Policy experts in Germany stay in a single position for 2 years on average.

Positions per freelancer

11

Azure Policy experts in Germany have completed 11 positions on average over the course of their careers.

Top business areas

Information Technology, Operations, Project Management

Azure Policy experts in Germany have gathered most of their hands-on project experience in Information Technology, Operations, and Project Management.

Top industries

Information Technology, Banking and Finance, Manufacturing

Azure Policy experts in Germany are most in demand in Information Technology, Banking and Finance, and Manufacturing.

Certification focus areas

Information Technology, Audit, Business Intelligence

Azure Policy experts in Germany earn their certifications most often in Information Technology, Audit, and Business Intelligence.

Bachelor's degree or higher

80%

80% of Azure Policy experts in Germany hold at least a Bachelor's degree.

Master's degree or higher

10%

10% of Azure Policy experts in Germany hold at least a Master's degree.

Certifications per freelancer

6

Azure Policy experts in Germany hold 6 professional certifications on average.

Most common languages

English, German, French

Azure Policy experts in Germany most often speak English, German, and French.

Speak two or more languages

91%

91% of Azure Policy experts in Germany speak two or more languages.

Based on our profile pool as of 29 Oct 2026.

Daily rate distribution

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
9% of Azure Policy experts in Germany charge less than €560 per day.
18% of Azure Policy experts in Germany charge between €560 and €640 per day.
27% of Azure Policy experts in Germany charge between €720 and €800 per day.
18% of Azure Policy experts in Germany charge between €800 and €880 per day.
9% of Azure Policy experts in Germany charge between €880 and €960 per day.
18% of Azure Policy experts in Germany charge €960 or more per day.
<€560 €560-​640 €720-​800 €800-​880 €880-​960 €960+

The chart shows how the daily rates of experts in this technology in Germany are distributed, based on recent contracts on our platform. Each bar covers a rate range — its height shows the share of experts charging within that range.

Average rates of experts in Germany using Azure Policy

Rates are based on recent contracts and do not include FRATCH margin.

800
600
400
200
Rate comparison chart
Daily rate avg. 763 €

The average daily rate is the mean of all daily rates from recent contracts of comparable freelancers on our platform.

800
600
400
200
Rate comparison chart
Median rate 776 €

The median daily rate is the middle value of all daily rates — half of comparable freelancers charge less, half charge more. Unlike the average, it is barely affected by outliers.

Calculated based on our freelancers’ daily rates as of 29 Oct 2026. Actual rates may vary depending on seniority level, experience, skill specialization, project complexity, and engagement length.

Azure Policy experts industry focus

See which industries our matched freelancers work in most often — every figure is calculated live from the freelancers on FRATCH.

  • Information Technology (91%)
  • Banking and Finance (82%)
  • Manufacturing (55%)
  • Automotive (45%)
  • Professional Services (45%)
  • Pharmaceutical (36%)
  • Energy (27%)
  • Healthcare (27%)

Please note that freelancers can work across multiple industries, so percentages overlap.

About the technology

Governance in Azure

Azure Policy is Microsoft Azure’s service for defining, assigning and auditing rules across cloud resources. Companies use it to require approved configurations, restrict resource locations, enforce tagging and detect non-compliant deployments without relying on manual reviews.

Core capabilities

Policies evaluate resources during creation and after deployment. Initiatives group related definitions, while assignments apply them to subscriptions, resource groups or management groups. Effects such as deny, audit, modify and deployIfNotExists support both preventive controls and automated remediation.

Ecosystem and tooling

Azure Policy works with Azure Resource Manager, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Azure Blueprints and Microsoft Entra ID. Strong specialists also use infrastructure-as-code and delivery tooling to keep governance rules versioned and repeatable:

  • Terraform and Bicep policy integration
  • Azure DevOps or GitHub Actions validation
  • Management group and subscription design
  • Compliance reporting and remediation tasks

When expertise matters

Companies often bring in freelance specialists when an Azure environment is expanding, governance is inconsistent or an audit exposes control gaps. In Germany, teams in regulated industries may also need clear collaboration between cloud, security and compliance stakeholders, with remote delivery combined with on-site workshops where useful.

  • Establish a policy baseline for new landing zones
  • Replace manual compliance checks with automated evaluation
  • Resolve policy conflicts across subscriptions
  • Create remediation plans for existing resources

What strong specialists deliver

A capable professional translates business and security requirements into maintainable policy definitions. They distinguish audit-only controls from blocking rules, test exclusions carefully and document initiative assignments so operations teams can manage them after handover. They also understand the effect of policy changes on existing workloads.

Selecting the right professional

Look for practical work with Azure Resource Manager, management groups, identity, networking and infrastructure-as-code. Ask for examples of policy design, remediation and exception handling rather than isolated rule creation. The right specialist can explain trade-offs clearly, protect delivery teams from unnecessary restrictions and leave behind tested definitions, documentation and operating guidance.

Published on:
FRATCH GPT

FRATCH GPT delivers freelancer proposals with clear reasoning and transparent pricing in minutes, helping your hiring department quickly and compliantly find the best talent.

Give it a try:

Try FRATCH GPT

Frequently asked questions

Not sure where to start with Azure Policy? These answers cover the essentials.

Azure Policy is used to enforce or assess rules for Azure resources and configurations. Companies apply it to control regions, resource types, tags, encryption settings, network exposure and other governance requirements across subscriptions and management groups.

Azure Policy governs whether resource configurations comply with defined rules, while Azure RBAC controls who can perform actions on those resources. They work together: identity permissions limit access, and policy evaluates the state or deployment of the resource.

A strong Azure Policy specialist usually understands Azure Resource Manager, management groups, Microsoft Entra ID, networking and security controls. Experience with Terraform, Bicep, Azure DevOps or GitHub Actions is valuable when policies must be tested and deployed through infrastructure-as-code workflows.

For a focused policy definition or assignment, a specialist can often work from clear requirements and an existing Azure structure. Broader governance work needs experience with subscription design, landing zones, remediation, exceptions and the operational impact of blocking deployments.

Yes, most Azure Policy work can be delivered remotely through shared repositories, Azure access controls and structured review sessions. On-site workshops can still help when German teams need to align cloud, security, operations and compliance requirements.

Ask how the specialist would test effects, manage exemptions and prevent a policy assignment from disrupting production workloads. Good answers cover initiative structure, remediation, version control, reporting and a documented change process rather than only individual rule syntax.

Azure Policy is an important governance layer, but it is not a complete operating model by itself. Effective control also depends on identity, network architecture, security monitoring, cost management, resource organization and clear ownership of exceptions.

Before starting an Azure Policy assignment, clarify the tenant structure, target scopes, existing initiatives, exemptions and whether policies should audit or block deployments. Freelancers should also confirm access, repository practices, compliance expectations and who approves changes to shared governance controls.

The average hourly rate of freelancers in Germany who have used Azure Policy in their recent projects is 95 €, which corresponds to a daily rate of about 763 € based on an 8-hour working day.

Of the freelancers in Germany who have used Azure Policy in their recent projects, 80% hold at least a Bachelor's degree and 10% hold at least a Master's degree.

On average, freelancers in Germany who have used Azure Policy in their recent projects have 17 years of professional experience, with a single engagement typically lasting around 2 years.

The most common languages among freelancers in Germany who have used Azure Policy in their recent projects are English (100%), German (91%), and French (45%).

The most common industries among freelancers in Germany who have used Azure Policy in their recent projects are Information Technology (91%), Banking and Finance (82%), and Manufacturing (55%).

The most common business areas among freelancers in Germany who have used Azure Policy in their recent projects are Information Technology (100%), Operations (64%), and Project Management (64%).

Main locations of FRATCH Experts, who have recently used Azure Policy

Our freelancers and interim experts are at home across the DACH region — available on-site in the major business hubs or fully remote. Choose a location to discover matched specialists, local market insights and up-to-date availability.

Berlin Hamburg Munich Cologne Frankfurt Stuttgart Dusseldorf Leipzig Dortmund Essen Bremen Dresden Hanover Nuremberg

Request a free demo

Get in touch with the FRATCH team and we will get back to you within 4 hours.

Contact form

Would you rather directly get in touch?
We always have the time for a call or email!

FRATCH CEO avatar

Philipp Thomaschewski

FRATCH CEO

LinkedInFRATCH